Note: Corrections added on 6 January 2012 after first publication online on 19 October 2011: The page number for this article should be Page 1403–1439 (not 1101–1137), and have been corrected in the online version of this article.
Integrating the Dynamics of Personality and Close Relationship Processes: Methodological and Data Analytic Implications
Article first published online: 19 OCT 2011
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Personality © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Personality
Special Issue: Understanding How Personality Operates in the Social World
Volume 79, Issue 6, pages 1403–1439, December 2011
How to Cite
Graber, E. C., Laurenceau, J.-P. and Carver, C. S. (2011), Integrating the Dynamics of Personality and Close Relationship Processes: Methodological and Data Analytic Implications. Journal of Personality, 79: 1403–1439. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00725.x
- Issue published online: 16 NOV 2011
- Article first published online: 19 OCT 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 7 FEB 2011 08:04AM EST
A common theme that has emerged from classic and contemporary theoretical work in both the fields of personality and relationship science is a focus on process. Current process-focused theories bearing on personality invoke a view of the individual in ongoing action and interaction with the environment, reflecting a flow of experience rather than a static depiction. To understand the processes by which personality interacts with the social environment (particularly dyads), investigations must capture individuals interacting in multiple interpersonal situations, which likely necessitates complex study designs and corresponding data analytic strategies. Using an illustrative simulated data set, we focus on diary methods and corresponding individual and dyadic multilevel models to capture person-situation interaction within the context of processes in daily close relationship life. Finally, we consider future directions that conceptualize personality and close relationship processes from a dynamical systems theoretical and methodological perspective.