Get access

Visual search in typically developing toddlers and toddlers with Fragile X or Williams syndrome

Authors

  • Gaia Scerif,

    Corresponding author
    1. Neurocognitive Development Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
    2. School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK
      Gaia Scerif or Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Neurocognitive Development Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; e-mail: g.scerif@ich.ucl.ac.uk or a.karmiloff-smith@ich.ucl.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Kim Cornish,

    1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • John Wilding,

    1. Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jon Driver,

    1. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Annette Karmiloff-Smith

    1. Neurocognitive Development Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Gaia Scerif or Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Neurocognitive Development Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; e-mail: g.scerif@ich.ucl.ac.uk or a.karmiloff-smith@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Visual selective attention is the ability to attend to relevant visual information and ignore irrelevant stimuli. Little is known about its typical and atypical development in early childhood. Experiment 1 investigates typically developing toddlers’ visual search for multiple targets on a touch-screen. Time to hit a target, distance between successively touched items, accuracy and error types revealed changes in 2- and 3-year-olds’ vulnerability to manipulations of the search display. Experiment 2 examined search performance by toddlers with Fragile X syndrome (FXS) or Williams syndrome (WS). Both of these groups produced equivalent mean time and distance per touch as typically developing toddlers matched by chronological or mental age; but both produced a larger number of errors. Toddlers with WS confused distractors with targets more than the other groups; while toddlers with FXS perseverated on previously found targets. These findings provide information on how visual search typically develops in toddlers, and reveal distinct search deficits for atypically developing toddlers.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary