SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • BERLE A.A. and MEANS G. C., 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York.
  • BLOCK S.R., 1998, Perfect Nonprofit Boards: Myths, Paradoxes and Paradigms, Simon and Schuster, Needham Heights MA.
  • BORZAGA C. and SANTUARI A., 2001, ‘Italy: from traditional cooperatives to innovative social enterprises’ in BorzagaC. and DefournyJ., eds, The Emergence of Social Enterprise, Routledge, London.
  • CORNFORTH C., 1996, ‘Governing non-profit organisations: heroic myths and human tales’, Researching the UK Voluntary Sector, National Council of Voluntary Organisations, London.
  • CORNFORTH C., 2001, ‘Understanding the governance of non-profit organizations: multiple perspectives and paradoxes’, a paper for the 30th Annual ARNOVA Conference, November 29 – December 1, 2001, Miami, USA.
  • CORNFORTH C., 2002, ‘The governance of public and non-profit organisations: a paradox perspective’, a paper for the Sixth International Research Symposium on Public Management, 8–10 April, 2002, University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • CORNFORTH C., 2003, ‘Introduction: the changing context of governance – emerging issues and paradoxes’ in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • CORNFORTH C. and Edwards C., 1998, Good Governance: Developing Effective Board-Management Relations in Public and Voluntary Organisations, CIMA, London.
  • CORNFORTH C. and Edwards C., 1999, ‘Board roles in the strategic management of non-profit organisations: theory and practice’, Corporate Governance, 7, 4, 346362.
  • DAVIS P., 1998, ‘Co-operative managers – servants or leaders? Towards a new model of co-operative leadership’ in The World of Co-operative Enterprise 1998, Plunkett Foundation, Oxford.
  • DEMB A. and NEUBAUER F., 1992, The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • GARRATT B., 1996, The Fish Rots from the Head – the Crisis in our Boardrooms: Developing the Crucial Skills of the Competent Director, Harper Collins, London.
  • GREER A., HOGGETT P. and MAILE S., 2003, ‘Are quasi-governmental organisations effective and accountable? in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • HAMPDEN-TURNER C., 1990, Charting the Corporate Mind: from Dilemma to Strategy, Blackwell, Oxford.
  • HANDY C., 1995, The Empty Raincoat: Making Sense of the Future, Arrow.
  • HARRIS, M.A., 1993, ‘Exploring the role of boards using total activities analysis’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3, 3, 269282.
  • HERMAN E.S., 1981, Corporate Control, Corporate Power, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • HERMAN R.D., 1989, ‘Concluding thoughts on closing the board gap’ in HermanR. and Van TilJ., eds., Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Analyses and Applications, Transaction, New Brunswick.
  • HUNG H., 1998, ‘A typology or theories of the roles of governing boards’, Corporate Governance, 6, 2, 101111.
  • HUTTON W., 1997, Stakeholding and its Critics, Choice in Welfare No.36, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
  • ITKONNEN R., 1996, ‘My views on co-operative corporate governance’, Review of International Co-operation, 89, 4, 2024.
  • KEASEY K., THOMPSON S. and WRIGHT M., 1997, ‘The corporate governance problem – competing diagnoses and solutions’, in Corporate Governance: Economic and Financial Issues, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • KIRKLAND K., 1994, The Good Trustee Guide, London: NCVO.
  • KRAMER R., 1985, ‘Towards a contingency model of board-executive relations’, Administration in Social Work, 9, 3, 1533.
  • LEES M., 1995, ‘Corporate governance in European co-operatives’ in The World of Co-operative Enterprise 1995, Plunkett Foundation, Oxford.
  • LEES M. and VOLKERS R., 1996, ‘General trends, findings and recommendations’, Review of International Co-operation, 89, 4, 3749.
  • LEWIS M. W., 2000, ‘Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide’, Academy of Management Review, 25, 4, 760776.
  • LOCKE M., BEGUM N. and ROBSON P., 2003, ‘Service users and charity governance’, in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • LORSCH J.W. and MACIVER E., 1989, Pawns or Potentates: the Reality of America's Corporate Boards, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.
  • MACE M., 1971, Directors: Myth and Reality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
  • MIDDLETON M., 1987, ‘Nonprofit boards of directors: beyond the governance function’, in W.Powell, ed., The Nonprofit Sector: a Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
  • MOLE V., 2003, ‘What are chief executives’ expectations and experiences of their boards’, in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • MORGAN G., 1986, Images of Organization, Sage, Beverly Hills CA.
  • MOWDAY R. and SUTTON R., 1993, ‘Organizational behaviour: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts’, Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195229.
  • MUTH M.M. and DONALDSON L., 1998, ‘Stewardship theory and board structure: a contingency approach’, Corporate Governance, 6, 1, 528.
  • OTTO S., 2003, ‘Not so very different: a comparison of the roles of chairs of governing bodies and managers in different sectors’, in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • O'SULLIVAN N. and DIACON S.R., 2003, ‘Board composition and performance in life insurance companies’ British Journal of Management, 14, 115129.
  • PFEFFER J. and SALANCIK G.R., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York.
  • PLUMMER J., 1994, The Governance Gap: Quangos and Accountability, LGC Communications, London.
  • POUND J., 1995, ‘The promise of the governed corporation’, Harvard Business Review, March-April.
  • ROBINSON F., SHAW K., DUTTON J., GRAINGER P., HOPWOOD B. and WILLIAMS S., 2000, Who Runs the North East … Now? University of Durham, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Durham. Available on http://www.dur.ac.uk/Sociology/nedemocracy.
  • ROCHESTER C., 2003, ‘The role of boards in small voluntary organisations’, in CornforthC., ed., The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations: What Do Boards Do? Routledge, London.
  • ROUSSEAU D. and FRIED Y., 2001, ‘Location, location, location: contextualising organizational research’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 114.
  • SARGENT M.J. and NICHOLLS J.R., 1994, ‘Outside non-executive directors of UK agricultural co-operatives’ in The World of Co-operative Enterprise 1995, Plunkett Foundation, Oxford.
  • SIVERTSEN S., 1996, ‘Governance issues seen form a management perspective’, Review of International Co-operation, 89, 4, 3436.
  • SKELCHER C., 1998, The Appointed State: Quasi-Governmental Organisations and Democracy, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • SPEAR R., 2004, ‘Governance in democratic member based organisations’, Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, this issue.
  • SUNDARAMURTHY C. and LEWIS M., 2003, ‘Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance’, Academy of Management Review, 28, 3, 397415.
  • TRICKER B., 2000, ‘Editorial – corporate governance – the subject whose time has come’, Corporate Governance, 8, 4, 289296.
  • TSOUKAS H., 2000, ‘What is management? An outline of a metatheory’ in AckroydS. and FleetwoodS., eds, Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations, Routledge, London.
  • WILSON, 1998, ‘Developing leaders in consumer co-operatives – contemporary issues in the training of directors and members’, The World of Co-operative Enterprise 1998, Plunkett Foundation, Oxford.
  • WOOD M.M., 1996, ‘Introduction: governance and leadership in theory and practice’ in WoodM. M., ed., Non-profit Boards and Leadership: Cases on Governance, Change and Board-Staff Dynamics,: Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.