Anthropology and the covert: Methodological notes on researching military and intelligence programmes (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)

Authors

  • Roberto J. González

    1. Associate Professor of Anthropology at San Jose State University. He has authored several books including Zapotec science: Farming and food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca (2001) and Militarizing culture: Essays on the warfare state (2010). He can be contacted at roberto.gonzalez@sjsu.edu.
    Search for more papers by this author

  • This is a modified version of a paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Anthropological Association in Montreal, Canada on 19 November 2011. The presentation was part of a panel entitled ‘Anthropologies of the Covert’ organized by Carole McGranahan. Two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript.

Abstract

This article reflects upon the methodological challenges posed by the study of secretive organizations and programmes. In particular, it examines the question: when participant-observation is not a feasible option, what techniques can anthropologists use to shed light upon covert military and intelligence agencies and the corporations that they contract? After reviewing anthropological research on secret societies from the late 18th and early 19th century, the author turns to contemporary anthropological work on bureaucratic institutions and initiatives that operate in secret. The author's own research into the US Army's Human Terrain System serves as an illustration. By adapting Laura Nader's suggestions for ‘studying up, down, and sideways’, the article suggests that documentary analysis (of both openly accessible and classified documents), interviews, and ‘self-analysis’ provide a fruitful combination of methods for an anthropology of the covert.

Ancillary