SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, R. 1979: ‘Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity’, Journal of Philosophy, 76, pp. 526.
  • Allaire, E. 1963: ‘Bare Particulars’, Philosophical Studies, 14, pp. 18.
  • Allaire, E. 1965: ‘Another Look At Bare Particulars’, Philosophical Studies, 16, pp. 1621.
  • Bain, J. 2004: ‘Theories of Newtonian Gravity and Empirical Indistinguishability’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, pp. 34576.
  • Bain, MS: ‘Towards Structural Realism’. Available online at <http://ls.poly.edu/jbain/papers/SR.pdf>.
  • Benacerraf, P. 1965: ‘What Numbers Could Not Be’, Philosophical Review, 74, pp. 4773; reprinted in P.Benacerraf and H.Putnam, (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1983).
  • Bird, A. 2007: Nature's Metaphysics: Dispositions, Laws, and Properties ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Black, M. 1952: ‘The Identity of Indiscernibles’, Mind, 61, pp. 15364.
  • Born, M., (ed.) 1971: The Born-Einstein Letters ( London : Macmillan).
  • Burgess, J. 1999: Review of Shapiro (1997), in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40, pp. 28391.
  • Busch, J. 2003: ‘What Structures Could Not Be’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, pp. 21125.
  • Button, T. 2006: ‘Realistic Structuralism's Identity Crisis: A Hybrid Solution’, Analysis, 66, pp. 21622.
  • Cao, T. 2003: ‘Structural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory’, Synthese, 136, pp. 324.
  • Carnap, R. 1928: The Logical Structure of the World ( Berkeley , CA : University of California Press).
  • Chappell, V. 1964: ‘Particulars Re-Clothed’, Philosophical Studies, 15, pp. 604.
  • Dipert, R. R. 1997: ‘The Mathemtical Structure of the World: The World as Graph’, Journal of Philosophy, 94, pp. 32958.
  • Esfeld, M. 2004: ‘Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, pp. 60117.
  • Esfeld, M. and V. Lam forthcoming: ‘Moderate Structural Realism About Space-Time’, Synthese.
  • French, S. and D. Krause 2006: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Analysis ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • French, S. and J. Ladyman 2003a: ‘Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure’, Synthese, 136, pp. 3156.
  • French, S. and J. Ladyman 2003b: ‘Between Platonism and Phenomenalism: Reply to Cao’, Synthese, 136, pp. 738.
  • French, S. and M. Redhead 1988: ‘Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, pp. 23346.
  • Gower, B. 2000: ‘Cassirer, Schlick and “Structural” Realism: The Philosophy of the Exact Sciences in the Background to Early Logical Empiricism’, British Journal for the History of Science, 8, pp. 71106.
  • Hagar, A. 2005: ‘A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Information Theory’, Philosophy of Science, 70, pp. 75275.
  • Harte, V. 2002: Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Hellman, G. 2005: ‘Structuralism’, in S.Shapiro, (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Hoefer, C. 1996: ‘The Metaphysics of Space-Time Substantivalism’, Journal of Philosophy, 93, pp. 527.
  • Horsten, L. forthcoming: ‘Criteria of Identity: Predicative and Impredicative.
  • Jackson, F. 1998: From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Kaplan, D. 1975: ‘How to Russell a Frege-Church’, Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 71629.
  • Keränen J. 2001: ‘The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism’, Philosophia Mathematica, 9, pp. 30830.
  • Ketland, J. 2006: ‘Structuralism and the Identity of Indiscernibles’, Analysis, 66, pp. 30315.
  • Ladyman, J. 1998: ‘What Is Structural Realism?’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 29, pp. 40924.
  • Ladyman, J. 2005: ‘Mathematical Structuralism and the Identity of Indiscernibles’, Analysis, 65, pp. 21821.
  • Ladyman, J. and D. Ross 2007: Everything Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Langton, R. 1998: Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Leitgeb, H. and J. Ladyman forthcoming: ‘Criteria of Identity and Structuralist Ontology’, Philosophica Mathematica.
  • Lewis, D. 1986: On the Plurality of Worlds ( Oxford : Blackwell).
  • Lewis, D. forthcoming: ‘Ramseyan Humility’, in D.Braddon-Mitchell, R.Nola and D.Lewis, (eds.), The Canberra Programme ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Lowe, E. J. 2003: ‘Individuation’, in M.Loux and D.Zimmerman, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Lowe, E. J. 2004: ‘The Four-Category Ontology: Reply to Kistler’, Analysis, 64, pp. 1527.
  • Lyre, H. 2004: ‘Holism and Structuralism in U(1) Gauge Theory’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, pp. 64370.
  • MacBride, F. 2004: ‘Introduction’, Philosophical Quarterly, 54, pp. 115.
  • MacBride, F. 2005: ‘Structuralism Reconsidered’, in S.Shapiro (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Logic and Mathematics ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • MacBride, F. 2006: ‘What Constitutes The Numerical Diversity of Mathematical Objects?’, Analysis, 66, pp. 639.
  • Maudlin, T. 1990: ‘Substances and Spacetimes: What Aristotle Would Have Said to Einstein’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21, pp. 53161.
  • Maudlin, T. 2002: Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 2nd edition ( Oxford : Blackwell).
  • Meiland, J. 1966: ‘Do Relations Individuate?’, Philosophical Studies, 17, pp. 659.
  • Mumford, S. 2004: Laws in Nature: Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy ( London : Routledge).
  • Parsons, C. 1990: ‘The Structuralist View of Mathematical Objects’, Synthese, 84, pp. 30346.
  • Parsons, C. 2004: ‘Structuralism and Metaphysics’, Philosophical Quarterly, 54, pp. 5677.
  • Pooley, O. 2006: ‘Points, Particles and Structural Realism’, in D.Rickles, S.French and J.Saatsi, (eds.), Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Psillos, S. forthcoming: ‘The Structure, the Whole Structure and Nothing But the Structure?’, Philosophy of Science, Supplementary Volume..
  • Quine, W. V. 1960: Word and Object ( Cambridge , MA : MIT Press).
  • Quine, W. V. 1976: ‘Grades of Discriminability’, Journal if Philosophy, 73, pp. 11316; reprinted in Theories and Things ( Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press, 1981).
  • Reck, E. and M. Price 2000: ‘Structures and Structuralism in Contemporary Philosophy of Mathematics’, Synthese, 125, pp. 34187.
  • Resnik, M. 1997: Mathematics as a Science of Patterns ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Russell, B. 1903: The Principles of Mathematics ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
  • Russell, B. 1911: ‘On the Relations of Universals and Particulars’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 12, pp. 124; reprinted in R. C.Marsh, (ed.), Logic and Knowledge ( London : George Allen & Unwin, 1956).
  • Saunders, S. 2003a: ‘Indiscernibles, General Covariance, and Other Symmetries’, in A.Ashtekar, D.Howard, J.Renn, S.Sarkar and A.Shimony, (eds.), Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics: Festschrift in Honour of John Stachel ( Dordrecht : Kluwer).
  • Saunders, S. 2003b: ‘Physics and Leibniz's Principles’, in K.Brading and E.Castellani, (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
  • Saunders, S. 2003c: ‘Structural Realism Again’, Synthese, 136, pp. 12733.
  • Saunders, S. 2006: ‘Are Quantum Particles Objects?’, Analysis, 66, pp. 5263.
  • Shapiro, S. 1997: Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Saunders, S. forthcoming: ‘Identity, Indiscernibility and Ante Rem Structuralism: The Story of i and —i'.
  • Shoemaker, S. 1980: ‘Causality and Properties’, in P.Van Inwagen, (ed.), Time and Cause ( Dordrecht : Reidel).
  • Stachel, J. 2002: ‘“The relations between things” versus “the things between relations”: The Deeper Meaning of the Hole Argument’, in D.Malament, (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics ( Chicago and LaSalle , IL : Open Court).
  • Stachel, J. 2005: ‘Structural Realism and Contextual Individuality’, in Y.Ben-Menahem (ed.). Hilary Putnam ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
  • Stachel, J. 2006: ‘Structure, Individuality and Quantum Gravity’, in D.Rickles, S.French and J.Saatsi, (eds.), Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  • Teller, P. 1995: An Interpretative Introduction to Quantum Field Theory ( Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press).
  • Van Fraassen, B. C. 2006: ‘Structure: Its Shadow and Substance’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, pp. 275307.
  • Worrall, J. 1989: ‘Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?’, Dialectica, 43, pp. 99124; reprinted in D.Papineau (ed.). The Philosophy of Science ( Oxford : Oxford University Press).