II—Transparent Self-Knowledge
Article first published online: 17 MAY 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00204.x
© 2011 The Aristotelian Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Boyle, M. (2011), II—Transparent Self-Knowledge. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 85: 223–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00204.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 17 MAY 2011
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
I distinguish two ways of explaining our capacity for ‘transparent’ knowledge of our own present beliefs, perceptions, and intentions: an inferential and a reflective approach. Alex Byrne (2011) has defended an inferential approach, but I argue that this approach faces a basic difficulty, and that a reflective approach avoids the difficulty. I conclude with a brief sketch and defence of a reflective approach to our transparent self-knowledge, and I show how this approach is connected with the thesis that we must distinguish between a kind of self-knowledge that is of oneself as agent and another kind that is of oneself as patient.

1467-8349/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=02c897ee24e5b66837002d4943943337dc34765d)
