1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Aristotle bequeathed to us a powerful metaphysical picture, of substances in which properties inhere. The picture has turned out to be highly problematic in many ways; but it is nevertheless a picture not easy to dislodge. Less obvious are the normative tones implicit in the picture and the way these permeate our system of values, especially when thinking of ourselves and our ambitions, hopes and fears. These have proved, if anything, even harder to dislodge than the metaphysical picture which supports them. This paper first draws out the ethics suggested by a conception of being as individual substances, and finds both inner tensions among these values—expressed in divergent characteristics in the history of philosophy—and a neglect of a significant set of values. Substance metaphysics prefers freedom, independence and autonomy over relational and reciprocal values, which can even be regarded as existentially threatening. A prominent attempt to accommodate both sorts of values without eschewing substantialist metaphysics is briefly considered, before turning to examine an alternative metaphysics and the values it implies. A metaphysics which takes being as becoming, it is argued, supports an ethics centred on relational values, and their associated virtues of care.



  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Anacker, Stefan (ed.) 1984: Seven Works of Vasubandhu, the Buddhist Psychological Doctor. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Aristotle 1924: Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Arnold, Dan 2010: ‘Nāgārjuna's “Middle Way”: A Non-Eliminative Way of Understanding Selflessness’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 64, pp. 36795.
  • Arnold, Dan 2012: ‘The Deceptive Simplicity of Nāgārjuna's Arguments Against Motion’. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40, pp. 55391.
  • Carpenter, Amber D. 2012: ‘Metaphysical Suffering, Metaphysics as Therapy’. In Nate Hinerman and Matthew Lewis Sutton (eds.), On Suffering: An Inter-Disciplinary Dialogue on Narrative and the Meaning of Suffering. Oxford: ID Press.
  • Carpenter, Amber D. 2014: Indian Buddhist Philosophy: Metaphysics as Ethics. Durham: Acumen.
  • The Cowherds forthcoming: Moonpaths: Ethics in Madhyamaka Philosophy.
  • Cox, Collett 1995: Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence. An Annotated Translation of the Section on Factors Dissociated from Thought from Saṅghabhadra's Nyāyānusāra. Studia Philological Buddhica, vol. 11. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
  • Dreyfus, Georges 1997: Recognizing Reality: Dharmakrti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Epictetus 1925: Discourses and Enchiridion. Greek edition with translation by W. A. Oldfather. 2 volumes. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Frede, Michael 2011: Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Garfield, Jay L. 1995: The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1714: Monadology. In G. W. Leibniz, Philosophical Texts. Edited and translated by R. S. Woolhouse and Richard Francks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • Marcus Aurelius 2013: Meditations, Books 1–6. Translated with an introduction and commentary by Christopher Gill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Nāgārjuna c. 1st century CE: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Translated with commentary as Garfield 1995.
  • Siderits, Mark 2004: ‘Causation and Emptiness in Early Madhyamaka’. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 32, pp. 393419.
  • Vasubandhu c. 4th century CE: Discussion of the Five Aggregates. Translated with notes in Anacker 1984.
  • Williams, Paul 1981: ‘On the Abhidharma Ontology’. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 9, pp. 22757.