SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Brandenberg, L. (1982) Internal paper 3: Project concept. Chiang Mai: Thai-German Highland Development Programme.
  • Bryant, R. (2002) Non-Governmental Organisations and Governmentality: ‘Consuming’ biodiversity and indigenous people in the Philippines, Political Studies 50(2): 268292.
  • Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (2000) Restaging the universal: Hegemony and the limits of formalism, in J.Butler, E.Laclau and S.Zizek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the Left, pp. 1143. London and New York: Verso.
  • Corbridge, S. (1998) ‘Beneath the pavement only soil’: The poverty of post-development, Journal of Development Studies 34(6): 138149.
  • Dean, M. (1992) A genealogy of the government of poverty, Economy and Society 21(3): 215251.
  • Department of Public Welfare, Thailand (1964) A brief on the hill tribe development and welfare programme in Northern Thailand. Bangkok: Department of Public Welfare, Ministry of the Interior.
  • Dirksen, H. (1993) Solving problems of opium production in Thailand: Lessons learnt from the TGHDP. Chiang Mai: Thai–German Highland Development Programme.
  • Dumm, T.L. (1996) Michel Foucault and the politics of freedom. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Escobar, A. (1995a) Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Escobar, A. (1995b) Imagining a post-development era, in J.Crush (ed.), Power of development, pp. 211227. London: Routledge.
  • Ferguson, J. (1994) The anti-politics machine: ‘Development,’ depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, Minnesota and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1991(1968) ) Politics and the study of discourse, in G.Burchell, C.Gordon and P.Miller (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, pp. 5372. London: Harvester.
  • Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2005) Surplus possibilities: Postdevelopment and community economies, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26(1): 426.
  • Hanks, J. and L. Hanks (2001) Tribes of the North Thailand frontier. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Southeast Asia Studies.
  • Kothari, U. (2005) Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent, Antipode 37(3): 425446.
  • Kothari, U. (2006) Spatial practices and imaginaries: Experiences of colonial officers and development professionals, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27(3): 235253.
  • Laclau, E. (1991) New reflections on the revolution of our time. London and New York: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation(s). London and New York: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. (2000) Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics, in J.Butler, E.Laclau and S.Zizek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the Left, pp. 4489. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. (2005) On populist reason. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
  • Li, T.M. (1999) Compromising power: Development, culture and rule in Indonesia, Cultural Anthropology 14(3): 295322.
  • McKinnon, K. (2004) Locating post-development subjects: Discourses of intervention and identification in the highlands of Northern Thailand. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Human Geography, The Australian National University.
  • McKinnon, K. (2007) Post-development, professionalism and the politics of participation, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97(4): 772785.
  • Manndorff, H. (1967) The hill tribe program of the Public Welfare Department, Ministry of the Interior, Thailand: Research and socio-economic development, in P.Kunstadter (ed.), Southeast Asian tribes, minorities and nations, pp. 525552. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Martin, L., H. Gutman and P.H. Hutton (eds.) (1988) Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Mouffe, C. (1993) The return of the political. London and New York: Verso.
  • Mouffe, C. (2005) On the political (thinking in action). New York: Routledge.
  • Nightingale, A.J. (2005) ‘The experts taught us all we know’: Professionalisation and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry, Antipode 37(3): 581604.
  • Renard, R. (2001) Opium reduction in Thailand 1970–2000. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books and United Nations Drug and Crime Programme.
  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schuurman, F.J. (2000) Paradigms lost, paradigms regained? Development studies in the twenty-first century, Third World Quarterly 21(1): 720.
  • Torpey, J. (2000) The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Townsend, J.G., G. Porter and E. Mawdsley (2002) The role of the transnational community of Non-Government Organisations: Governance or poverty reduction? Journal of International Development 14(6): 829329.
  • Townsend, J.G., G. Porter and E. Mawdsley (2004) Creating spaces of resistance: Development NGOs and their clients in Ghana, India and Mexico, Antipode 36(5): 871889.
  • Zizek, S. (1991) Beyond discourse-analysis, in E.Laclau (ed.), New reflections on the revolution of our time, pp. 249260. London and New York: Verso.