1467-839X/asset/AJSP_left.gif?v=1&s=c961f951773057a602b7c5aae45943e8a5edd11e)
Exchanges of group-based favours: Ingroup bias in the prisoner's dilemma game with minimal groups in Japan and New Zealand
Article first published online: 9 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00258.x
© 2008 The Authors. © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd with the Asian Association of Social Psychology and the Japanese Group Dynamics Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Liu, J. H. and Pauling, J. (2008), Exchanges of group-based favours: Ingroup bias in the prisoner's dilemma game with minimal groups in Japan and New Zealand. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11: 196–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00258.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 AUG 2008
- Article first published online: 9 JUL 2008
- Received 25 May 2007; accepted for publication 9 December 2007.
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cooperation;
- culture;
- generalized exchange;
- ingroup bias;
- prisoner's dilemma game
Japanese (N = 48) and New Zealander (N = 55) participants were first assigned to one of two minimal groups, and then played a prisoner's dilemma game twice with an ingroup member and twice with an outgroup member. In one of the two games they played with an ingroup (or outgroup) member, participants and their partner knew one another's group memberships (mutual-knowledge condition). In the unilateral-knowledge condition, only the participants knew the group membership of their partner, but the partner did not know the group membership of the participant. Ingroup bias in cooperation emerged only in the mutual-knowledge condition in both countries; in the unilateral-knowledge condition no ingroup bias emerged. Mediational analyses found that, in accord with predictions, cooperation in the mutual-knowledge condition is mediated by expectation of the partner's cooperation. Ingroup bias in the mutual-knowledge condition emerged only among those who identified with the ingroup. Results provide support for a group heuristics account of ingroup favouritism in the minimal group. According to this account, participants who face minimal groups activate an ecologically adaptive heuristic of unilaterally cooperating with members of the same group, expecting indirect repayment from others in the same group.