SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Stewart AL, Greenfield S., Hays RD, Wells KB, Rogers WH, Berry SD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. J Am Med Assoc 1989; 262(7): 90713.
  • 2
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale ( NJ ) : Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
  • 3
    Jacobson N., Traux P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59(1): 1219.
  • 4
    Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinshy FD. Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 17.
  • 5
    Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34(3): 22033.
  • 6
    Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimally important difference. Control Clin. Trials 1989; 10: 40715.
  • 7
    Norman GR, Sridhar FG, Guyatt GH, Walter SD. Relation of distributionand anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 2001; 39(10): 103947.
  • 8
    Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in healthrelated quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41(5): 58292.
  • 9
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., Osbome R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 20924.
  • 10
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., McNeil H. Utility Weights for the Australian Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument. Preliminary report. Melbourne ( AUST ) : Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 1999. p. 25.
  • 11
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., Day NA. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med 2001; 33: 35870.
  • 12
    Hawthorne G., Cheok F., Goldney R., Fisher L. The excess cost of depression in South Australia: a comparative study of two methods of calculating burden. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003; 37(3): 36273.
  • 13
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J. Measuring the value of program outcomes: a review of utility measures. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2001; 1(2): 21528.
  • 14
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., Day N. A comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments. Aust Stud Health Serv Adm 2001; 89: 15179.
  • 15
    Herrman H., Hawthorne G., Thomas R. Quality of life assessment in people living with psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002; 37(11): 51018.
  • 16
    Hogan A., Hawthorne G., Kethel L., Giles E., White K., Stewart M., et al. Health related quality-of-life outcomes from adult cochlear implantation: a crosssectional study. Cochlear Implants Intern 2001; 2(2): 11528.
  • 17
    Osborne R., Hawthorne G., Papanicolaou M., Wegmuller Y. Measurement of rapid changes in health outcomes in people with influenza symptoms. J Outcomes Res 2000; 4: 1530.
  • 18
    Sturm JW, Osborne RH, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RA, Thrift AG. Brief comprehensive quality of life assessment after stroke: the assessment of quality of life instrument in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2002; 33(12): 288894.
  • 19
    Wilson D., Wakefield M., Taylor A. The South Australian Health Omnibus Survey. Health Promot J Aust 1992; 2: 479.
  • 20
    Gilchrist J., Gray L., Slee J., Hawthorne G. North Eastern Coordinated Care Trial: a Victorian coordinated care trial. In: The Australian Coordinated Care Trials: Background and Trial Descriptions. Canberra ( AUST ) : Commonwealth of Australia; 1999. p. 11328.
  • 21
    Segal L., Day N., Day S., Dunt D., Piterman H., Robertson I., et al. Evaluation of the Southern. Health Care Network Coordinated Trial. Full Report. Melbourne ( AUST ) : Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 2003.
  • 22
    Segal L., Dunt D., Day SE, Day NA, Robertson I., Hawthome G. Introducing co-ordinated care (1): a randomised trial assessing client and cost outcomes. Health Policy 2004; 69(2): 20113.
  • 23
    Ross P., Stoelwinder J., Allwell L. The Southern Health Care Network Coordinated Care Trial: a Victorian coordinated care trial. In: The Australian Coordinated Care Trials: Background and Trial Descriptions. Canberra ( AUST ) : Commonwealth of Australia; 1999. p. 14964.
  • 24
    Slee J., Agius S., Keller J., Gilchrist J., Gray L., Hawthorne G. North Eastern Coordinated Care Trial. Final Evaluation Report. Melboume ( AUST ) : Centre for Applied Gerontology; 2000.
  • 25
    Harris A., Gospodarevskaya E., Callaghan J., Story I. The cost effectiveness of a pharmacist reviewing medication among the elderly in the community. Aust J Ageing 2001; 20(4): 1792001.
  • 26
    Kennedy M., Osborne RH. Care Coordination in Emergency Medicine. Evaluation Report. Melbourne ( AUST ) : Hospital Admissions Risk Program, Victorian Department of Human Services; 2002.
  • 27
    Richardson J., Hawthorne G. Difficulty with life and death: methodological issues and results from the utility scaling of the ‘Assessment of Quality of Life’ (AQoL) instrument. Aust Stud Health Serv Adm 1999; 86: 12139.
  • 28
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., Day N., Osborne R., McNeil H. Construction, and Utility Scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument. Melbourne ( AUST ) : Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 2000. p. 35.
  • 29
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation. Guide. Boston ( MA ) : The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1993.
  • 30
    Hawthorne G., Richardson J., Day N., McNeil H. Using the ‘Assessment of Quality of Life’ (AQoL) Instrument. Technical Report. Melbourne ( AUST ) : CHPE; 2000. Report No.: 12.
  • 31
    Walters SJ, Brazier JE. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health. Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 18.
  • 32
    SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences [computer program] for Windows. Version 11.5. Chicago ( IL ) : SPSS; 2003.
  • 33
    GraphPadInStat: statistical package. Version 3.02. San Diego ( CA ) : GraphPad Software; 2000.
  • 34
    Watson E., Finnan D., Baade P., Ring I. Telephone administration of the SF-36 health survey: validation studies and population norms for adults in Queensland. Aust N Z J Public Health 1996; 20(4): 35963.
  • 35
    Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001; 33: 3449.
  • 36
    Beaton DE. Simple as possible? Or too simple? Possible limits to the universality of the one half standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41(5): 5936.
  • 37
    Wright JG. Interpreting health-related quality of life scores: the simple rule of seven may not be so simple. Med Care 2003; 41(5): 5978.
  • 38
    Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1956; 63(2): 8197.
  • 39
    Foddy W. Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge ( UK ) : Cambridge University Press; 1993.
  • 40
    Norman GR, Stratford P., Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(8): 86979.
  • 41
    Macedo A., Farre M., Banos JE. Placebo effect and placebos: what are we talking about? Some conceptual and historical considerations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 59(4): 33742.
  • 42
    Hrobjartsson A., Gotzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(21): 1594602.
  • 43
    Wyrwich KW, Metz SM, Babu AN, Kroenke K., Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. The reliability of retrospective change assessments. Qual Life Res 2002; 11(7): 636.
  • 44
    Hawthorne G., Hogan A., Giles E., Stewart M., Kethel L., White K., et al. Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int J Audiol 2004; 43(4): 18392.
  • 45
    Osborne RH, Hawthorne G., Lew EA, Gray LC. Quality of Life assessments in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument and comparison with the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56(2): 13847.
  • 46
    Holland R., Smith R., Harvey I., Swift L., Lenaghan E. Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL. Health Econ 2004; 13(8): 793805.
  • 47
    Goldney RD, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH, Cheok F. Suicidal ideation and health-related quality of life in the community. Med J Aust. 2001; 175(10): 5469.
  • 48
    Segal L., Day N., Day S., Dunt D., Piterman H., Robertson I., et al. Evaluation of the Southern Health Care Network Coordinated Care Trial. Final Report. Volume I: Executive Summary. Melbourne ( AUST ) : Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 2000.