SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Wylie C., King J. How Do Effective Schools Manage Their Finances? [Funding study released page on the Internet]. Wellington ( NZ ) : New Zealand School Trustees Association; 2004 [cited 6 October 2004]. Available from: http:www.nzsta.org.nzw Frameset_Content.aspPageID100002644&Levelone100002644.
  • 2
    Marketing Social Change. Wellington ( NZ ) : Health Sponsorship Council; 2001.
  • 3
    Kenway J., Bullen E. Promiscuous corporations: desiring schoolchildren. In: Consuming Children: Education — Entertainment — Advertising. Buckingham ( UK ) : Open University Press; 2001. p. 91120.
  • 4
    Cimmins J., Horn M. Sponsorship: from management ego trip to marketing success. J Advertising Res. 1996; 36(4): 1119.
  • 5
    Molnar A., Reaves JA. What should we teach? Buy me!Buy Me!: Fourth annual report on commercialism in schools. Educ Leadership. 2001; 59(2): 19.
  • 6
    Molnar A. Cashing In On Kids: The Second Annual Report On Trends In Schoolhouse Commercialism [EPSL Education Policy Studies Laboratory: CERU page on the Internet]. Temple ( AZ ) : Arizona State University; 1999 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http:www.asu.edueducepslCERUAnnual20reportscace-99-21.htm.
  • 7
    Feuerstein A. Selling our schools? Principals' views on schoolhouse commercialism and school-business interactions. Educ Admin Q. 2001; 37(3): 32271.
  • 8
    Molnar A. Looking for Funds in All the Wrong Places: Exclusive Agreements and Incentive Programs may be Doing More Harm Than Good [EPSL Education Policy Studies Laboratory:CERU page on the Internet]. Temple ( AZ ) : Arizona State University; 2000 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http:www.asu.edueducepslCERUDocumentscace-0004.htm.
  • 9
    French SA, Story M., Fulkerson JA. School food policies and practices: a state-wide survey of secondary school principals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102(12): 17859.
  • 10
    Wechsler H., Brener ND, Kyester S., Miller C. Food service and foods and beverages available at school: results from the school health policies and programs study 2000. J Sch Health. 2001; 71(7): 31324.
  • 11
    Nestle M. Soft drink “pouring rights”: marketing empty calories. Public Health Rep. 2000; 115: 30819.
  • 12
    Fried EJ, Nestle M. The growing political movement against soft drinks in schools. J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288(17): 2181.
  • 13
    Wiehe S., Lynch H., Park K. Sugar high: the marketing of soft drinks to America's schoolchildren. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158(3): 20911.
  • 14
    Turnbull A., Barry D., Wickens K., Crane J. Changes in body mass index in 11–12 year old children in Hawkes Bay, New Zealand (1989–2000). J Paediatr Child Health. 2004; 40: 337.
  • 15
    Carter M-A, Swinburn B. Measuring the ‘obesogenic’ food environment in New Zealand primary schools. Health Prom Int. 2004; 19(1): 1520.
  • 16
    Lytle LA, Seifert S., Greenstein J., McGovern P. How do children's eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. Am J Health Prom. 2000; 14(4): 2228.
  • 17
    One news/AAP. McDonald's Health Role Panned. [News Health Headlines page on the Internet]. Television New Zealand. Wellington ( NZ ) : TVNZ; 2004 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http:tvnz.co.nzviewnews_health_story_skin4356563 fformathtml.
  • 18
    Crooks DL. Trading nutrition for education: nutritional status and the sale of snack foods in an Eastern Kentucky School. Med Anthropology Q. 2003; 17(2): 18299.
  • 19
    Glegg A. Supping with the devil? Fundraising, sponsorship, and the Canadian public school system. Inter J Educ Reform. 1997; 6(2): 13946.
  • 20
    Molnar A. Corporate Involvement in Schools: Time for a More Critical Look. [EPSL Education Policy Studies LaboratorylCERU page on the Internet online]: Temple ( AZ ) : Arizona State University; 2000 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http:www.asu.edueducepslCERUDocumentscace-01-01.html.
  • 21
    Murry SR. Should commercial sponsorship be used to subsidize athletic programs J Phys Educ Rec Dance. 2002; 73:9.