SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Results. Canberra ( AUST ): ABS; 2001.
  • 2
    Mathur S., Gajanayake I., Hodgson G. Diabetes as a Cause of Death, Australia, 1997 and 1998. Canberra ( AUST ): Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2000.
  • 3
    Daniel M., Rowley KG, McDermott R., O'Dea K. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in Aboriginal Australians: prevalence and risk. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002; 57: 2333.
  • 4
    American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2005: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(1 suppl): 436.
  • 5
    World Health Organization. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva ( CHE ): WHO; 1999.
  • 6
    Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 31607.
  • 7
    Amoah AGB. Undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in adult Ghanaians using the ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria. Acta Diabetol. 2002; 39: 713.
  • 8
    Levitt NS, Unwin NC, Bradshaw D., Kitange HM, Mbanya J-CN, Mollentze WF, et al. Application of the new ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes to population studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Diabet Med. 2000; 17: 3815.
  • 9
    DeVegt F., Dekker JM, Stehouwer CDA, Nijpels G., Bouter LM, Heine RJ. The 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria versus the 1985 World Health Organisation criteria for the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance: poor agreement in the Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 168690.
  • 10
    Fornengo P., Bruno A., Grassi G., Vineis P., Pagano G. Concordance between American Diabetes Association and World Health Organisation Criteria in a northwestern Italian population. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 652.
  • 11
    Qiao Q., Nakagami T., Tuomilehto J., Borch-Johnsen K., Balkau B., Iwamoto Y. et al. Comparison of the fasting and the 2-h glucose for diabetes in different Asian cohorts. Diabetologia. 2000; 43: 14705.
  • 12
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 15974.
  • 13
    Bloch DA. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same “gold standard” in the same sample. Biometrics. 1997; 53: 7385.
  • 14
    Cheng H., Macaluso M., Hardin JM. Validity and coverage of estimates of relative accuracy. Ann Epidemiol. 2000; 10: 25160.
  • 15
    Connell FA, Koepsell TD. Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121: 74453.
  • 16
    Guerrero-Romero F., Rodríguez-Morán M., Alvarado-Ruiz R. Concordance between the 1997 fasting American Diabetes Association criteria and the World Health Organisation criteria in healthy Mexican subjects. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 527.
  • 17
    Drzewoski J., Czupryniak L. Concordance between fasting and 2-h post-glucose challenge criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in high risk individuals. Diabet Med. 2001; 18: 2931.
  • 18
    Metcalf PA, Scragg RKR. Comparison of WHO and ADA criteria for diagnosis of glucose status in adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000; 49: 116980.
  • 19
    Choi KM, Lee J., Kim DR, Kim SK, Shin DH, Kim NH, et al. Comparison of ADA and WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes in elderly Koreans. Diabet Med. 2002; 19: 8537.
  • 20
    Gomez-Perez FJ, Perez-Jauregui J., Aguilar-Salinas CA, Guillen-Pineda LE, Lopez-Alvarenga JC, Rull JA. Lack of agreement between the World Health Organisation category of impaired glucose tolerance and the American Diabetes Association category of impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 18868.