SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allais, M. 1984, ‘The foundations of the theory of utility and risk’, in O.Hargen and F.Wenstrop (eds), Progress in Utility and Risk Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3131.
  • Anderson, J.R. and Dillon, J.L. 1992, Risk Analysis in Dryland Farming Systems, Farming Systems Management Series no. 2, FAO, Rome.
  • Anderson, J.R., Dillon, J.L. and Hardaker, J.B. 1977, Agricultural Decision Analysis, Iowa State University Press, Ames.
  • Anderson, J.R. and Hardaker, J.B. 2003, ‘Risk aversion in economic decision making: Pragmatic guides for consistent choice by natural resource managers’, in J.Wesseler, H.-P.Weikard and R.Weaver (eds), Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 171188.
  • Goh, S., Shih, C.-C., Cochran, M.J. and Raskin, R. 1989, ‘A generalised stochastic dominance program for the IBM PC’, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 21, pp. 175182.
  • Hadar, J. and Russell, W.R. 1969, ‘Rules for ordering uncertain prospects’, American Economic Review, vol. 49, pp. 2534.
  • Hammond, J.S. 1974, ‘Simplifying the choice between uncertain prospects where preference is nonlinear’, Management Science, vol. 20, pp. 10471072.
  • Hanoch, G. and Levy, H. 1969, ‘Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36, pp. 335345.
  • Hardaker, J.B., Huirne, R.B.M., Anderson, J.R. and Lien, G. 2004, Coping with Risk in Agriculture, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford.
  • King, P.K. and Robison, L.J. 1981, ‘An interval approach to measuring decision maker preferences’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 63, pp. 510520.
  • King, P.K. and Robison, L.J. 1984, ‘Risk efficiency models’, in P.J.Barry (ed.), Risk Management in Agriculture, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 6881.
  • Levy, H. 1992, ‘Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis’, Management Science, vol. 38, pp. 555583.
  • Lin, W.R. and Chang, H.S. 1978, ‘Specification of Bernoullian utility function in decision analysis’, Agricultural Economics Research, vol. 30, pp. 3036.
  • McCarl, B.A. 1988, ‘Preference among risky prospects under constant risk aversion’, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 20, pp. 2533.
  • McCarl, B.A. 1990, ‘Generalized stochastic dominance: an empirical examination’, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 22, pp. 4955.
  • Meyer, J. 1977, ‘Choice among distributions’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 14, pp. 326336.
  • Meyer, J. 2001, ‘Expected utility as a paradigm for decision making in agriculture’, in R.E.Just and R.P.Pope (eds), A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in US Agriculture, Kluwer, Boston, pp. 319.
  • Mjelde, J.W. and Cochran, M.J. 1988, ‘Obtaining lower and upper bounds on the value of seasonal climate forecasts as a function of risk preferences’, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 13, pp. 283293.
  • Rabin, M. 2000, ‘Risk aversion and expected utility theory: a calibration theorem’, Econometrica, vol. 68, pp. 12811292.
  • Rabin, M. and Thaler, R.H. 2001, ‘Anomalies: risk aversion’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, pp. 219232.
  • Richardson, J.W., Schumann, K. and Feldman, P. 2001, Simetar: Simulate Excel to Analyze Risk, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University. [Online]. Available: http://www.afpc.tamu.edu/courses/643/downloads.php?dir=7
  • Robison, L.J. and Myers, R.J. 2001, ‘Ordering risky choices’, in: R.E.Just and R.D.Pope (eds), A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in US Agriculture, Kluwer, Boston, pp. 4151.
  • Tsiang, S.C. 1972, ‘The rationale of the mean-standard deviation analysis, skewness preference, and the demand for money’, American Economic Review, vol. 62, pp. 354371.
  • Zentner, R.P., Greene, D.D., Hickenbotham, T.L. and Eidman, V.R. 1981, ‘Ordinary and generalised stochastic dominance: a primer’, Department Agriculture and Applied Economics, staff paper, University of Minnesota, pp. 8127.