SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

The results from seven choice modelling applications designed to value improved river health in New South Wales are reported. These applications were designed to provide value estimates that could be used, through benefit transfer, to value improvements in the health of other rivers within the state. Because of limitations on the number of rivers that could be valued and populations sampled, a pooled model for use in benefit transfer was also estimated. The results indicate that both use and non-use values were found to exist for all catchments. In addition, value estimates were found to differ across catchments when populations resident within catchments were sampled. However, when populations resident outside catchments were sampled for two of these catchments, value estimates were found to be statistically similar. This indicates the importance of valuing improved river health in specific catchments by sampling populations within catchments. Yet, it also indicates that it is less critical to conduct multiple surveys of residents outside catchments to value improved river health.

Footnotes
  • Mark Morrison is Senior Lecturer in the School of Marketing and Management, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia and Jeff Bennett is Professor of Environmental Management, National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Bennett, J. 1999, ‘A threshold value analysis of proposed forestry reserves’, Australian Forestry, vol. 61, pp. 18.
  • Bennett, J. and Blamey, R. 2000, The Choice Modelling Approach to Non-Market Valuation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • Bennett, J. and Morrison, M. 2001, ‘Valuing the environmental attributes of NSW rivers’, report prepared for the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority, Environmental and Resource Economics, Gundaroo.
  • Bennett, J., Morrison, M. and Harvey, R. 2000,A river somewhere – valuing the environmental attributes of rivers’, paper presented at the International Society for Ecological Economics 2000 Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, 5–8 July.
  • Blamey, R., Bennett, J., Louviere, J., Morrison, M. and Rolfe, R. 2002, ‘Attribute causality in environmental choice modelling’, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 23, pp. 167186.
  • Brookshire, D.S. and Neil, H.R. 1992, ‘Benefit transfers: conceptual and empirical issues’, Water Resources Research, vol. 28, pp. 651655.
  • Desvousges, W.H., Naughton, M.C. and Parsons, G.R. 1992, ‘Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies’, Water Resources Research, vol. 28, pp. 675683.
  • Greene, W.H. 2002, ‘NLOGIT Version 3.0 Reference Guide’, Econometric Software Inc, New York.
  • Hahn, G.J. and Shapiro, S.S. 1966,A catalogue and computer program for the design and analysis of symmetric and asymmetric fractional factorial experiments’, report no. 66-0-165, General Electric Research and Development Centre, New York.
  • Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. 1984, ‘Specification tests for the multinomial logit model’, Econometrica, vol. 52, pp. 12191240.
  • Hausman, J.A. and Ruud, P. 1987, ‘Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 34, pp. 8310.
  • Kling, C.L. and Thomson, C.J. 1996, ‘The implications of model specification for welfare estimation in nested logit models’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 78, pp. 103114.
  • Loomis, J.B. 1992, ‘The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer’, Water Resources Research, vol. 28, pp. 701705.
  • Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. and Swait, J.D. 2000, Stated Choice Methods – Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
  • Morrison, M. 2000, ‘Aggregation biases in stated preference studies’, Australian Economic Papers, vol. 39, pp. 215230.
    Direct Link:
  • Morrison, M.D., Bennett, J.W., Blamey, R.K. and Louviere, J.J. 2002, ‘Choice modelling and tests of benefit transfer’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, pp. 161170.
    Direct Link:
  • Morrison, M.D., Blamey, R.K. and Bennett, J.W. 2000, ‘Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies’, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 16, pp. 407422.
  • Pate, J. and Loomis, J. 1997, ‘The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California’, Ecological Economics, vol. 20, pp. 199207.
  • Pearmain, D., Swanson, J., Kroes, E. and Bradley, M. 1991, Stated Preference Techniques: A Guide to Practice, Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group, Surrey and Netherlands.
  • Poe, G.L., Severance-Lossin, E.K. and Welsh, M.P. 1994, ‘Measuring the difference (X-Y) of simulated distributions: a convolutions approach’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 76, pp. 904915.
  • Stevens, T.H., Moore, T.A. and Glass, R.J. 1994, ‘Interpretation and temporal stability of CV bids for wildlife experience: a panel study’, Land Economics, vol. 70, pp. 355363.
  • Sutherland, R.J. and Walsh, R. 1985, ‘Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality’, Land Economics, vol. 61, pp. 281291.
  • Van Bueren, M. and Bennett, J. 2004, ‘Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 48, pp. 132.