SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agthe, D. and Billings, R. (1987). Equity, price elasticity, and household income under increasing block rates for water, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 46, 273286.
  • Arbués, F., Barberán, R. and Villanúa, I. (2000). Water Price Impact on Residential Water Demand in the City of Zaragoza: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach, 40th European Congress of the European Regional Studies Association in Barcelona, 30–31 August.
  • Arbués, F., García-Valiñas, M. and Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2003). Estimation of residential water demand: A state-of-the-art review, Journal of Socio-Economics 32, 81102.
  • Barkatullah, N. (1996). OLS and Instrumental Variable Price Elasticity Estimates for Water in Mixed-effects Model Under Multiple Tariff Structure, Report No. 226, Department of Economics, University of Sydney, NSW.
  • Bartoszczuk, P. and Nakamori, Y. (2004). Modelling sustainable water prices, in Quaddus, M. and Siddique, A. (eds) Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning: Studies in Modelling and Decision Support. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Billings, R.B. and Agthe, D.E. (1980). Price elasticity for water: A case of increasing block rates, Land Economics 56, 7384.
  • Creedy, J., Van De Ken, J. and McKenzie, K. (1998). The demand for water by single-metered and group-metered households, The Australian Economic Review 31, 203210.
  • Dalhuisen, J., De Groot, H. and Nijkamp, P. (2001). Thematic Report on the Economics of Water in Metropolitan Areas, European Commission: Environment and Climate Programme, Metropolitan Areas and Sustainable Use of Water. Available from URL: http://www.feweb.vu.nl/[accessed March 2005].
  • Dandy, G., Nguyen, T. and Davies, C. (1997). Estimating residential water demand in the presence of free allowances, Land Economics 73, 125139.
  • Dinar, A. and Subramanian, A. (1998). Policy implications from water pricing in various countries, Water Policy 1, 239250.
  • Dinar, A. and Subramanian, A. (eds) (1997). Water Pricing Experiences, World Bank Technical Paper, No. 386, Available from URL: http://www.worldbank.org/[accessed March 2005].
  • Essential Services Commission of Victoria (2004). Economic Regulation of the Victorian Water Sector: Approach to Pricing. Workshop Discussion Paper. Essential Services Commission of Victoria, Melbourne, Vic.
  • Foster, H.S. and Beattie, B.R. (1981). On the specification of price in studies of consumer demand under block price scheduling, Land Economics 57, 624629.
  • García, S. and Reynaud, A. (2003). Estimating the benefits of efficient water pricing in France, Journal of Resource and Energy Economics 26, 125.
  • Gaudin, S., Griffin, R. and Sickles, R. (2001). Demand specification for municipal water management: evaluation of the Stone–Geary form, Land Economics 77, 399422.
  • Government Prices Oversight Commission Tasmania (2003a). Urban Water and Wastewater Pricing Guidelines, January 2003, Available from URL: http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/[accessed March 2005].
  • Government Prices Oversight Commission Tasmania (2003b). Urban Water Pricing: Principles for Efficient Water Pricing, Available from URL: http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/[accessed March 2005].
  • Gujarati, D.N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. McGraw Hill, Boston.
  • Hewitt, J. and Hanemann, W. (1995). A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing, Land Economics 71, 173192.
  • Higgs, H. and Worthington, A. (2001). Consumer preferences and charging options in a large urban municipality: a case study, Public Works Management and Policy 5, 209207.
  • Höglund, L. (1999). Household demand for water in Sweden with implications of a potential tax on water use, Water Resources Research 35, 38533863.
  • Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (2003). Investigation into price structures to reduce the demand for water in the Sydney basin, Discussion Paper DP72. Available from URL: http://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au[accessed March 2005].
  • Ipe, V. and Bhagwat, S. (2002). Chicago's water market: Dynamics of demand, prices and scarcity rents, Applied Economics 34, 21572163.
  • Klawitter, S. (2003). A Methodical Approach for Multicriteria Sustainability Assessment of Water Pricing in Urban Areas, 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Available from URL: http://www.fu-berlin.de/[accessed March 2005].
  • Marsden Jacob Associates (1997). Two-Part Tariffs: Economic Evaluation of Effectiveness, Project Report. Local Government Association of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland.
  • Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2003). Estimating water demand under increasing-block tariffs using aggregate data and proportions of users per block, Environmental and Resource Economics 26, 523.
  • Miaou, S.P. (1990). A class of time series urban water demand models with non-linear climatic effects, Water Resources Research 26, 169178.
  • Nieswiadomy, M. (1992). Estimating urban residential water demand: effects of price structure, conservation, and education, Water Resources Research 28, 609615.
  • Nordin, J.A. (1976). A proposed modification of Taylor's demand analysis: comment, The Bell Journal of Economics 7, 719721.
  • Pashardes, P. and Hajispyrou, S. (2002). Consumer Demand and Welfare under Increasing Block Pricing, Discussion Paper 2002-07, Department of Economics, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Renwick, M. and Archibald, S. (1998). Demand-side management policies for residential water use: Who bears the conservation burden? Land Economics 74, 343359.
  • Renwick, M., Green, R. and McCorkle, C. (1998). Measuring the Price Responsiveness of Residential Water Demand in California's Urban Areas, Report Prepared for the California Department of Water Resources, May 1998. Available from URL: http://rubicon.water.ca.gov/[accessed March 2005].
  • Rietveld, P., Rouwendal, J. and Zwart, B. (2000). Block rate pricing of water in Indonesia: and analysis of welfare effects, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 36, 7392.
  • Thomas, F. and Syme, G. (1988). Estimating residential price elasticity of demand for water: a contingent valuation approach, Water Resources Research 24, 18471857.