• Behn, R. D. 2003. ‘Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures.’ Public Administration Review 63(5):586606.
  • Bowling, C. J., C.-L. Cho and D. S. Wright. 2004. ‘Establishing a Continuum from Minimising to Maximising Bureaucrats: State Agency Head Preferences for Governmental Expansion: A Typology of Administrator Growth Postures, 1964–98.’ Public Administration Review 64(4):489499.
  • Chan, H. S. and J. Gao. 2009. ‘Putting the Cart Before the Horse: Accountability or Performance?’ Australian Journal of Public Administration S1:S51-S61.
  • Chen, N. 2009. ‘Policy Achievements.’ Close-Up: Chou Hsi Wei. Available from
  • Dollery, B. and P. Hamburger. 1995. ‘The Dunleavy and Niskanen Models of Bureaucracy: The Case of Australian Federal Budget Sector 1982–92.’ UNE Working Papers in Economics 19.
  • Dunleavy, P. 1985. ‘Bureaucrats, Budgets and the Growth of the State: Reconstructing an Instrumental Model.’ British Journal of Political Science 15(3):299328.
  • Dunleavy, P. 1991. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Hemel Hempstead : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Ebdon, C. and A. L. Franklin. 2004. ‘Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process.’ Public Budgeting and Finance 24(1):3249.
  • Hatry, H. P. and L. H. Blair. 1976. ‘Citizen Surveys for Local Governments: A Copout, Manipulative Tool, or a Policy Guidance and Analysis Aid?’ In T. N. Clark (ed). Citizen Preferences and Urban Public Policy. Beverly Hills , CA : Sage:129139.
  • Ho, Y. 2010. ‘New Hope Centre's Application Rate Dropped Sharply.’ Libertytimes: 4 August 2010.
  • Hwang, E. K. 2005. ‘Policies Opinion and Administrative Satisfaction: MiaoLi County Government Case Study.’ Policy Research 5:103144.
  • James, O. 2003. The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall: Public Interest versus Bureaushaping Interpretations. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ju, S. 2006. ‘Six Cities Said No to Pay-per-pag Waste Collection Fee Program.’ UDN News: 5 September 2006.
  • Kelly, J. M. and D. Swindell. 2002. ‘A Multiple-Indicator Approach to Municipal Service Evaluation: Correlating Performance Measurement and Citizen Satisfaction Across Jurisdictions.’ Public Administration Review 62(5):610621.
  • King, C. S., K. M. Feltey and B. O. N. Susel. 1998. ‘The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.’ Public Administration Review 58(4):317326.
  • Lin, C. 2010. ‘Chou Hsi Wei Got the Award for Establishing Low-Carbon City.’ China Times: 13 January 2010.
  • Lowndes, V. 1996. ‘Varietes of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal.’ Public Administration 74(2):181197.
  • Marsh, D., M. J. Smith and D. Richards. 2000. ‘Bureaucrats, Politicians and Reform in Whitehall: Analysing the Bureau-Shaping Model.’ British Journal of Political Science 30(3):461482.
  • Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representativ Government. Chicago : Aldine Atherto.
  • NTC-DBAS. 2011. NTC Citizen Survey. New Taipei : Department of Budget, Accounting, and Statistics.
  • Poister, T. H. and G. Streib. 1994. ‘Municipal Management Tools from 1976 to 1993: An Overview and Update.’ Public Productivity and Management Review 18(2):115125.
  • Rubin, I. S. 1990. ‘Budget Theory and Budget Practice: How Good the Fit?’ Public Administration Review 50(2):179189.
  • Ryu, J. E., C. J. Bowling, C.-L Cho and D. S. Wright. 2008. ‘Exploring Explanations of State Agency Budgets: Institutional Budget Actors or Exogenous Environment?’ Public Budgeting and Finance 28(3):2347.
  • Schachter, H. L. 1997. Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: the Role of Citizen Owners in Making a Better Government. Albany , NY : State University of New York Press.
  • Su, T.-T. 2007. ‘Public Budgeting Reform in Taiwan.’ In G. E. Caiden and T.-T. Su (eds). The Repositioning of Public Governance: Global Experience and Challenges. Taipei : Best-Wise:321345.
  • Thomas, J. C. 1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Wilson, L. A. 1983. ‘Preference Revelation and Public Policy: Making Sense of Citizen Survey Data.’ Public Administration Review 43(4):335342.