SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • alcoholism;
  • ARESLD;
  • liver transplantation;
  • moral responsibility

ABSTRACT

A number of philosophers have argued that alcoholics should receive lower priority for liver transplantations because they are morally responsible for their medical conditions. In this paper, I argue that this conclusion is false. Moral responsibility should not be used as a criterion for the allocation of medical resources. The reason I advance goes further than the technical problem of assessing moral responsibility. The deeper problem is that using moral responsibility as an allocation criterion undermines the functioning of medicine.