THE MORAL OBLIGATION TO CREATE CHILDREN WITH THE BEST CHANCE OF THE BEST LIFE
Article first published online: 5 DEC 2008
© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Volume 23, Issue 5, pages 274–290, June 2009
How to Cite
SAVULESCU, J. and KAHANE, G. (2009), THE MORAL OBLIGATION TO CREATE CHILDREN WITH THE BEST CHANCE OF THE BEST LIFE. Bioethics, 23: 274–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00687.x
- Issue published online: 26 MAY 2009
- Article first published online: 5 DEC 2008
- genetic selection;
- procreative beneficence
According to what we call the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PB), couples who decide to have a child have a significant moral reason to select the child who, given his or her genetic endowment, can be expected to enjoy the most well-being. In the first part of this paper, we introduce PB, explain its content, grounds, and implications, and defend it against various objections. In the second part, we argue that PB is superior to competing principles of procreative selection such as that of procreative autonomy. In the third part of the paper, we consider the relation between PB and disability. We develop a revisionary account of disability, in which disability is a species of instrumental badness that is context- and person-relative. Although PB instructs us to aim to reduce disability in future children whenever possible, it does not privilege the normal. What matters is not whether future children meet certain biological or statistical norms, but what level of well-being they can be expected to have.