Get access

REFLECTIONS ON ‘AUTISTIC INTEGRITY’

Authors

  • BARBARA RUSSELL

    Corresponding author
    1. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto
      Barbara Russell Phd MBA, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada. Email: barbara_russell@camh.net
    Search for more papers by this author

Barbara Russell Phd MBA, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada. Email: barbara_russell@camh.net

ABSTRACT

Autism, particularly its moderate to severe forms, has prompted considerable scientific study and clinical involvement because the associated behaviours imply disconnections with valued features of a ‘good’ life, such as close relationships, enjoyment, and adaptability. Proposed causes of autism involve potent philosophical concepts including consciousness, identity, mind, and relationality. The concept of autistic integrity is used by Barnbaum in The Ethics of Autism: Among Them, But Not of Them to help provide moral justification to stop efforts to cure adults with autism, especially if the cause is presumed to be a lack of a theory of mind.1 This article has two goals: (1) to apply four familiar definitions or characterizations of integrity to the case of moderate to severe autism, and (2) to examine whether autistic integrity does provide the moral justification Barnbaum seeks.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary