SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackers, P. (2002). ‘Reframing employment relations: the case for neo-pluralism’. Industrial Relations Journal, 33: 219.
    Direct Link:
  • Ackers, P. (2005). ‘Between the devil and the deep blue sea: global IR history, the British tradition, and the European renaissance’. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, 27: 93–104.
  • Ackers, P. (2007). ‘Collective bargaining as industrial democracy: Hugh Clegg and the political foundations of British industrial relations pluralism’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45: 77101.
  • Ackers, P. (2010). ‘An industrial relations perspective on employee participation’. In A. Wilkinson , P. Gollan , M. Marchington and D. Lewin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Employee Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5275.
  • Ackers, P. (2011). ‘Finding the future in the past? The social philosophy of Oxford industrial relations pluralism’. In K. Townsend and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Research Handbook on the Future of Work and Employment Relations. Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 4566.
  • Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2003a). Understanding Work & Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2003b). ‘Introduction: the British industrial relations tradition — formation, breakdown, and salvage’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127.
  • Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2008). ‘Industrial relations and the social sciences’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 5368.
  • Babbage, C. (1832). On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Knight.
  • Bacon, N. (2003). ‘Human resource management and industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–88.
  • Bain, G. and Clegg, H. (1974). ‘A strategy for industrial relations research in Great Britain’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12: 91113.
  • Bain, G. and Clegg, H. and Woolven, G. (1979). A Bibliography of British Industrial Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baldamus, W. (1961). Efficiency and Effort. London: Tavistock.
  • Behrend, H. (1963). ‘The field of industrial relations’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1: 383394.
  • Blyton, P., Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. and Heery, E. (2008). The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage.
  • Blyton, P., Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. and Heery, E. and Turnbull, P. (2004). The Dynamics of Employee Relations, 3rd edn. London: Palgrave.
  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review.
  • Brown, W. (1997). ‘The high tide of consensus: the system of industrial relations in Great Britain (1954) revisited’. Historical Studies Industrial Relations, 4: 135149.
  • Brown, W. (1998). ‘Clegg, Hugh Armstrong (1920–1995)’. In M. Poole and M. Warner (eds.), The IEBM Handbook of Human Resource Management. London: International Thomson, pp. 847–52.
  • Budd, J. and Bhave, D. (2008). ‘Values, ideologies, and frames of reference in industrial relations’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 92112.
  • Bugler, J. (1968). ‘The New Oxford Group’. New Society, February, pp. 221–2.
  • Childs, J. (1969). British Management Thought. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Clarke, L., Donnelly, E., Hyman, R., Kelly, J., McKay, S. and Moore, S. (2011). ‘What's the point of industrial relations?International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 27: 239253.
  • Clarkson, J. (1953). ‘The background of Fabian theory’. Journal of Economic History, 13: 462471.
  • Clay, H. (1929). The Problem of Industrial Relations and Other Lectures. London: Macmillan.
  • Clegg, H. (1960). A New Approach to Industrial Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Cole, G. D. H. (1935). Economic Planning. London: Kenikat.
  • Cole, G. D. H. (1953). History of Socialist Thought: The Forerunners, 1789–1850. London: St Martin's.
  • Colling, T. and Terry, M. (2010). Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. London: Wiley.
  • Corfield, A. (1969). Epoch in Workers’ Education: A History of the Workers’ Educational Association Trade Union Committee. London: WEA.
  • Crouch, C. (1982). Trade Unions: The Logic of Collective Action. Glasgow: Fontana.
  • Dangerfield, G. (1997). The Strange Death of Liberal England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Darlington, R. (2009). What's the Point of Industrial Relations? In Defence of Critical Social Science. Manchester: BUIRA.
  • Deakin, S. and Njoya, W. (2008). ‘The legal framework of employment relations’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 284304.
  • Dunlop, J. (1958). Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.
  • Edwards, P. (1986). Conflict at Work. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Edwards, P. (1995). ‘From industrial relations to the employment relationship’. Relations Industrielles, 50: 3965.
  • Edwards, P. (2003a). Industrial Relations, Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Edwards, P. (2003b). ‘The employment relationship and the field of industrial relations’. In P. Edwards (ed.), Industrial Relations, Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 136.
  • Evensky, J. (2005). ‘ “Chicago Smith” versus “Kirkaldy Smith” ’. History of Political Economy, 37: 197203.
  • Ewing, K. (2003). ‘Labour law and industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 138160.
  • Fabian Society (1906). Socialism and Labour Policy. Tract No.127. London: Fabian Society.
  • Farnham, D. (2008). ‘Beatrice and Sidney Webb and the intellectual origins of British industrial relations’. Employee Relations, 30: 534552.
  • Flanders, A. (1964). The Fawley Productivity Agreements. London: Faber.
  • Ackers, P. (1965). Industrial Relations: What is Wrong with the System? An Essay on Its Theory and Future. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Flanders, A. and Clegg, H. (1954). The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Fogarty, M. (1953). The Function of an Undergraduate Department of Industrial Relations. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Fogarty, M. (1955). ‘Industrial relations: studies in the universities’. Times Review of Industry, January, pp. 17–8.
  • Fox, A. (1966). Industrial Sociology and Industrial Relations. Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations, Research Paper 3. London: HMSO.
  • Fox, A. (1973). ‘Industrial relations: a social critique of pluralist ideology’. In J. Child (ed.), Man and Organization. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 185233.
  • Fox, A. (1990). A Very Late Development. Warwick: IRRU, Warwick University.
  • Frege, C. (2005). Employment Research and State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frege, C. (2008). ‘The history of industrial relations as a field of study’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 3552.
  • Friedman, A. (1977). Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Macmillan.
  • Gall, G. (2003). ‘Marxism and industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 316–24.
  • Gannett, F. and Catherwood, B. (1939). I ndustrial and Labour Relations in Great Britain: A Symposium. New York: America's Future.
  • Gennard, J. (1986). ‘Ben Roberts: an appreciation’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 21: 3–23.
  • Goldman, L. (1995). Dons and Workers: Oxford and Adult Education since 1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Gollan, P. (2006). Employee Representation in Non-Union Firms. London: Sage.
  • Gospel, H. (1992). Markets, Firms, and the Management of Labour in Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greene, A. (2003). ‘Women in industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305315.
  • Groenewegen, P. (1994). ‘Alfred Marshall and the labour commission, 1891–1894’. European Journal of the History of Thought, 1: 273296.
  • Hamann, K. and Kelly, J. (2008). ‘Varieties of capitalism and industrial relations’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 129148.
  • Harris, J. (1977). William Beveridge: A Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Harrison, R. (2000). The Life and Times of Sidney and Beatrice Webb 1859–1905. London: Palgrave.
  • Heery, E. (2008). ‘System and Change in Industrial Relations Analysis’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 69–91.
  • Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A., Bacon, N., Blyton, P. and Fiorito, J. (2008). ‘Introduction: the field of industrial relations’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , E. Heery , and J. Fiorito (eds.), Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 132.
  • Hichens, W. (1919). The New Spirit in Industrial Relations. London: Nisbet.
  • Hilton, J. (1931). Industrial Relations: Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hutchison, T. (1953). A Review of Economic Doctrines, 1870–1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hyman, R. (1975). Industrial Relations: A Marxist Introduction. London: Macmillan.
  • Hyman, R. (1989). The Political Economy of Industrial Relations. London: Macmillan.
  • Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European Trade Unions: Between Market, Class and State. London: Sage.
  • Hyman, R. (2003). ‘The historical evolution of British industrial relations’. In P. Edwards (ed.), Industrial Relations, Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 5880.
  • Babbage, C. (2004). ‘Is industrial relations theory always ethnocentric?’ In B. Kaufman (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship. Madison, WI: IRRA, pp. 265292.
  • Jenkins, J. and Blyton, P. (2008). ‘ ‘Works councils’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 346357.
  • Jevons, W. (1882). The State in Relation to Labour. London: Macmillan.
  • Kaufman, B. (2004). The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas, and the IIRA. Geneva: ILO.
  • Kaufman, B. (2008). ‘Paradigms in industrial relations: original, modern and versions in-between’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46: 314339.
  • Bacon, N. (2010). ‘The theoretical foundation of industrial relations and its implications for labour economics and human resource management’. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 64: 74108.
  • Kaye, H. (1984). The British Marxist Historians. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism, and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
  • Kelly, J. (2010). Ethical Socialism and the Trade Unions. London: Routledge.
  • Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1990). Labour Process Theory. London: Macmillan.
  • Lyddon, D. (2003). ‘History and industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89118.
  • Makepeace, F. (1881). Capital and Labour. London: Simpkin, Marshall.
  • Marsden, D. (1999). A Theory of Employment Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Marsden, R. (1982). ‘Industrial relations: a critique of empiricism’. Sociology, 16: 232250.
  • Marshall, A. (with Mary Paley Marshall). (1879). Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan.
  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
  • Martin, R. (1998). ‘The British tradition of industrial relations research: the contribution of W. E. J. (Lord) McCarthy’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36: 83–97.
  • McCarthy, W. (1994). ‘The involvement of academics in British industrial relations’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32: 201217.
  • Middlemas, K. (1979). Politics in Industrial Society: The Experience of the British System since 1911. London: Andre Deutsch.
  • Morrison, C. (1854). An Essay on the Relations between Labour and Capital, 1972 reprint. New York: Arno Press.
  • Pimlott, B. (1984). Fabian Essays in Socialist Thought. London: Heinemann.
  • Pocock, B. (2008). ‘Equality at work’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 572587.
  • Procter, S. (2008). ‘New forms of work and the high performance paradigm’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 149169.
  • Reisman, D. (1976). Adam Smith's Sociological Economics. London: Croom Helm.
  • Richardson, J. (1954). An Introduction to the Study of Industrial Relations. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Roberts, B. (1972). ‘Affluence and disruption’. In W. Robson (ed.), Man and the Social Sciences. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 245272.
  • Roberts, I. (2003). ‘Sociology and industrial relations’. In P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–42.
  • Royal Commission on Labour (1894). Fifth and Final Report. London: HMSO.
  • Smith, A. (1776/1937). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.
  • Smith, J. (1955). ‘The scope of industrial relations’. British Journal of Sociology, 6: 8085.
  • Strauss, G. and Whitfield, K. (2008). ‘Changing traditions in industrial relations research’. In P. Blyton , N. Bacon , J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 170186.
  • Tawney, R. (1964). The Radical Tradition. London: Pantheon.
  • Thompson, E. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. London: Pantheon.
  • von Otter, C. (2002). ‘Sweden’. In D. Cornfield and R. Hodson (eds.), Worlds of Work: Building an International Sociology of Work. New York: Kluwer, pp. 325345.
  • Voskeritsian, H. (2010). The Intellectual and Institutional Development of BUIRA: A Sixty Years Retrospective. Manchester: BUIRA.
  • Webb, S. (1919). The Works Manager Today. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1894). History of Trade Unionism. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1897). Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1898). Problems of Modern Industry. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1920). Constitution for the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain. London: LSE.
  • Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1923). Decay of Capitalist Civilization. London: Fabian Society.
  • Wood, S. (1982). ‘The study of management in British industrial relations’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 13: 5161.
  • Wright, A. (1979). G. D. H. Cole and Socialist Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Wylie, T. (1950). A Concise Guide to Industrial Relations. Birmingham: Industrial Administration Group, Birmingham Central Technical College.