SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aram, J. D. and P. F. Salipente, Jr (2003). ‘Bridging Scholarship in Management: Epistemological Reflections’, British Journal of Management, 14 (3), pp. 189205.
  • Berle, A. and C. G. Means (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Macmillan, New York.
  • Bohm, D. and F. Peat (1989). Science, Order and Creativity. Routledge, London.
  • Bratton, R. (2002). ‘Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value’, Tulane Law Review, 76 (5 & 6), pp. 12751362.
  • Cadbury, A. (1992). ‘The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee & Co, London.
  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1996). ‘Changing Times and Accounts: Tales from an Organizational Field’. In R.Munro and J.Mouritsen (eds), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, pp. 307327. International Thompson Business Press, Oxford.
  • Daily, C., D. R. Dalton and A. A. Cannella (2003). ‘Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data’, Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), pp. 371383.
  • Davis, G. F. (1991). ‘Agents Without Principals? The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 583613.
  • Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson (1997). ‘Towards a Stewardship Theory of Management’, Academy of Management Review, 22, pp. 2047.
  • Demb, A. and F. F. Neubauer (1992). The Corporate Board. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Dickson, M. (2003). ‘The Forces Pushing Sir Ken and Sir Peter Closer Together: Higgs Report’, Financial Times, January 25/26, p. 13.
  • Donaldson, L. (1995). Anti-Managerial Theories of the Firm, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis (1991). ‘Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns’, Australian Journal of Management, 16, pp. 4964.
  • Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis (1994). ‘Boards and Company Performance: Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom’, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 2, pp. 151160.
  • Douglas, M. (1986). ‘The Social Preconditions of Radical Skepticism’. In J.Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 6887. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  • Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
  • Eisenhardt, K. L. (1989). ‘Agency Theory: A Review and Assessment’, Academy of Management Review, 14, pp. 5774.
  • Fama, E. F. (1980). ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 88, pp. 288307.
  • Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen (1983). ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301325.
  • Financial Reporting Council (2003). Combined Code on Corporate Governance. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
  • Forbes, D. P. and F. J. Milliken (1999). ‘Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups’, Academy of Management Review, 24, pp. 489505.
  • Garratt, B. (1996). The Fish Rots from the Head. Harper Collins, London.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Polity, Cambridge.
  • Greenbury, R. (1995). Directors Remuneration, Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury. Gee & Co, London.
  • Hambrick, D. A. (1994). ‘1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered?’, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 1116.
  • Hampel, R. (1998). Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report. Gee & Co, London.
  • Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach (1991). ‘The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance’, Financial Management, 20, pp. 101112.
  • Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach (2003). ‘Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature’, Economic Policy Review – Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April, 9 (1), pp. 726.
  • Higgs, D. (2002). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors: Consultation Paper. Department of Trade and Industry/HMSO, London.
  • Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. Department of Trade and Industry/HMSO, London.
  • Hill, S. (1995). ‘The Social Organisation of Boards of Directors’, British Journal of Sociology, 46, pp. 245278.
  • Hillman, A. J. and T. Dalziel (2003). ‘Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives’, Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), pp. 383396.
  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (ed.) (2001). ‘Facing the Future: the Nature and Purpose of Management Research Re-assessed’, British Journal of Management, 12 , Special Issue, pp. S1S80.
  • Janis, I. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. (2nd edition). Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
  • Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976). ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305360.
  • Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily and A. E. Ellstrand (1996). ‘Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda’, Journal of Management, 22, pp. 409438.
  • Keasey, K. and R. Hudson (2002). ‘Non-Executive Directors and the Higgs Consultation Paper, ‘Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors’, Journal of Financial Regulation & Compliance, 10 (4), pp. 361372.
  • Keasey, K. and M. Wright (1993). ‘Issues in Corporate Accountability and Governance: An Editorial’, Accounting and Business Research, 23 (91A), pp. 291304.
  • Kennedy, A. (2000). The End of Shareholder Value: the Real Effects of the Shareholder Value Phenomenon and the Crisis it is Bringing to Business. Orion, London.
  • Kesner, I. F. and R. B. Johnson (1990). ‘An Investigation of the Relationship between Board Composition and Stockholder Suits’, Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 327336.
  • Kesner, L. F., B. Victor and B. T. Lamont (1986). ‘Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies’, Academy of Management Journal, 29, pp. 789799.
  • Kosnik, R. (1987). ‘Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, pp. 163185.
  • Lewicki, R. I., D. J. McAllister and R. J. Bies (1998). ‘Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities’, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp. 438458.
  • Lorsch, J. W. and E. MacIver (1989). Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of Americas's Corporate Boards. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA.
  • Lynall, M. D., B. R. Golden and A. J. Hillman (2003). ‘Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: A Multi-Theoretic View’, Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), pp. 416431.
  • MacIntyre, A. (1980). After Virtue. Duckworth, London.
  • Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and Reality. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA.
  • Mallette, P. and K. L. Fowler (1992). ‘Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of Poison Pills’, Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp. 10101035.
  • McNulty, T. and A. M. Pettigrew (1999). ‘Strategists on the Board’, Organization Studies, 20, pp. 4774.
  • McNulty, T., J. Roberts and P. Stiles (2003). Creating Accountability Within the Board: The Work of the Effective Non-executive Director. Department of Trade and Industry, London. Available at: http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_exec_review.
  • Millstein, I. and D. MacAvoy (1998). ‘The Active Board of Directors and Improved Performance of the Large Publicly Traded Corporation’, Columbia Law Review, 98 (5), pp. 12831321.
  • Monks, R. and N. Minow (1991). Power and Accountability in the Boardroom. Harper Collins, New York.
  • O'Neal, D. and H. Thomas (1995). ‘Director Networks/Director Selection: The Board's Strategic Role’, European Management Journal, 13, pp. 7990.
  • O'Neill, O. (2002). ‘A Question of Trust: Lecture Four, Trust and Transparency’. Reith Lectures, British Broadcasting Corporation, Radio 4, London.
  • Pahl, R. E. and J. T. Winkler (1974). ‘The Economic Elite; Theory and Practice’. In P. J.Stanworth and A.Giddens (eds), Elites and Power in British Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organisations: A Critical Essay. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). ‘On Studying Managerial Elites’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 163182.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). ‘The Double Hurdles for Management Research’. In T.Clarke (ed.), Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D.S. Pugh, pp. 277296. Dartmouth Press, London.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. and T. McNulty (1998). ‘Sources and Uses of Power In and Around the Boardroom’, European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 7 (2), pp. 197214.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. and T. McNulty (1995). ‘Power and Influence in and around the Boardroom’, Human Relations, 48, pp. 845873.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). ‘Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp. 218228.
  • Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource-Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Pye, A. (2001). ‘A Study in Studying Corporate Boards over Time: Looking Backwards to Move Forwards’, British Journal of Management, 12, pp. 3346.
  • Pye, A. (2002). ‘Corporate Directing: Governing, Strategising and Leading in Action’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10 (3), pp. 153163.
  • Roberts, J. (1996). ‘From Discipline to Dialogue: Individualising and socialising Forms of Accountability’. In R.Munro and J.Mouritsen (eds), Accountability, Power and Ethos. Chapman Hall, London.
  • Roberts, J. (2001). ‘Trust and Control in Anglo-American Systems of Corporate Governance: The Individualising and Socialising Effects of Processes of Accountability’, Human Relations, 54 (12), pp. 15471572.
  • Roberts, J. (2002). ‘Building the Complementary Board: the Work of the Plc Chairman’, Long Range Planning, 35, pp. 493520.
  • Roberts, J. and P. Stiles (1999). ‘The Relationship between Chairmen and Chief Executives: Competitive or Complementary Roles?’, Long Range Planning, 32 (1), pp. 3648.
  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). US Legislature H.R.3763.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Books, London.
  • Short, H., K. Keasey, A. Hull and M. Wright (1998). ‘Corporate Governance, Accountability and Enterprise’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6, pp. 151166.
    Direct Link:
  • Sternberg, E. (2004). Corporate Governance: Accountability in the Market Place. (2nd edition). Institute of Economic Affairs, Hobbs, London.
  • Stiles, P. (2001). ‘The Impact of Boards on Strategy: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (5), pp. 2750.
  • Sundaramurthy, C. and M. Lewis (2003). ‘Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance’, Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), pp. 397415.
  • Tranfield, D. and K. Starkey (1998). ‘The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy’, British Journal of Management, 9, pp. 341353.
  • Tricker, R. I. (1984). Corporate Governance. Gower, Aldershot.
  • Useem, M. (1996). Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers are Changing the Face of Corporate America. Harper Collins, New York.
  • Walsh, J. P. and J. K. Seward (1990). ‘On the Efficiency of Internal and External Control Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review, 15, pp. 421458.
  • Weick, K. E. (1999). ‘Theory Construction as Disciplined Reflexivity: Trade-Offs in the 90's’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), pp. 797806.
  • Westphal, J. D. (1998). ‘Board Games: How CEOs adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (3), pp. 511537.
  • Westphal, J. D. (1999). ‘Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioural and Performance Consequences of CEO-board Social Ties’, Academy of Management Journal, 42, pp. 724.
  • Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce (1989). ‘Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model’, Journal of Management, 15 (2), pp. 291334.