The data discussed in the paper were collected in collaboration with Rino Fasol from the Department of Sociology and Social Research of the University of Trento (Italy). His contribution is gratefully acknowledged. I am also in debt to Jacky Swan, Harry Scarbrough, Bjørn Erik Mørk and Katrin Gilbert, and the anonymous reviewers of the journal for their valuable comments on previous versions of this manuscript. I also wish to thank Dawn Coton for her invaluable editorial support. Financial support for this research was provided in part by the Provincia Autonoma of Trento (Italy), Progetto Scientifico No. 6-2001.
Medical Innovation as a Process of Translation: a Case from the Field of Telemedicine
Version of Record online: 8 NOV 2010
© 2009 The Author(s). British Journal of Management © 2009 British Academy of Management
British Journal of Management
Volume 21, Issue 4, pages 1011–1026, December 2010
How to Cite
Nicolini, D. (2010), Medical Innovation as a Process of Translation: a Case from the Field of Telemedicine. British Journal of Management, 21: 1011–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00627.x
- Issue online: 8 NOV 2010
- Version of Record online: 8 NOV 2010
The paper makes a case for the use of sociology of translation as a way of integrating the classical rational and stepwise view of innovation, showcasing its capacity to produce accounts of innovation that are process oriented, sensitive to contextual conditions, and attentive to its political, conflictual and institutional aspects. It does so by utilizing the approach to study the establishment and mainstreaming of cardiac telecare in northern Italy. Building on the results of a three-year longitudinal study, the paper describes the process through which this innovative approach carved a space within the existing texture of medical practices by enrolling in successive waves a range of allies and support. The detailed narration brings to the fore some crucial aspects of the local processes of negotiation and struggle and, more generally, the work and effort that goes into the making of any innovation. The paper concludes that this way of studying and narrating innovation is particularly capable of bringing back time, effort and politics into the account of the innovation process.