SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahuja, G. and C. Lampert (2001). ‘Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions’, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 521543.
  • Akgün, A. E. and G. S. Lynn (2002). ‘New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market: an extended model’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 5, pp. 117129.
  • Amit, R. and P. J. H. Schoemaker (1993). ‘Strategic assets and organizational rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 3346.
  • Armstrong, J. S. and T. S. Overton (1977). ‘Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp. 396402.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). ‘Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation’, Journal of Marketing, 69, pp. 6183.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. and H. Li (2002). ‘When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States’, Journal of Marketing, 66, pp. 6181.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1990). ‘Assessing method variance in multitrait–multimethod matrices: the case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp. 547560.
  • Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny (1986). ‘The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 11731182.
  • Birkinshaw, J. and C. B. Gibson (2004). ‘Building ambidexterity into an organization’, Sloan Management Review, 45, pp. 4755.
  • Cao, Q., E. Gedajlovic and H. Zhang (2009). ‘Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects’, Organization Science, 20, pp. 781796.
  • Chang, Y-C., P. Y. Yang and M.-H. Chen (2009). ‘The determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective’, Research Policy, 38, pp. 936946.
  • Christensen, C. M. and J. L. Bower (1996). ‘Customer power, strategic investment and the failure of leading firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 197218.
  • Cox, T. (1994). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Crowne, D. P. and D. Marlowe (1960). ‘A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology’, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, pp. 349354.
  • Denison, D. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Wiley.
  • Denison, D. R. (1996). ‘What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars’, Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 619654.
  • Denison, D. R. and A. K. Mishra (1995). ‘Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness’, Organization Science, 6, pp. 204223.
  • Douglas, S. P. and C. S. Craig (2007). ‘Collaborative and iterative translation: an alternative approach to back translation’, Journal of International Marketing, 15, pp. 3043.
  • Duncan, R. B. (1976). ‘The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation’. In R. H. Kilmann , L. R. Pondy and D. P. Slevin (eds), The Management of Organization Design, Vol. 1, pp. 167188. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven (1990). ‘Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 504529.
  • van Everdingen, Y. M. and E. Waarts (2003). ‘The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations’, Marketing Letters, 14, pp. 217232.
  • Ferner, A., P. Almond and T. Colling (2005). ‘Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of “workforce diversity” in US multinationals’, Journal of International Business Studies, 36, pp. 304321.
  • Fisher, R. J. and J. E. Katz (2000). ‘Social desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values’, Psychology and Marketing, 17, pp. 105120.
  • Floyd, S. W. and P. J. Lane (2000). ‘Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal’, Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 154177.
  • Fornell, C. (1992). ‘A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience’, Journal of Marketing, 56, pp. 621.
  • Ghoshal, S. and C. Bartlett (1994). ‘Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality in management’, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue), pp. 91112.
  • Gibson, C. B. and J. Birkinshaw (2004). ‘The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity’, Academy of Management Journal, 47, pp. 209226.
  • Gort, M. and S. Klepper (1982). ‘Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations’, Economic Journal, 92, pp. 630653.
  • Gupta, A. K., K. E. Smith and C. E. Shalley (2006). ‘The interplay between exploration and exploitation’, Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp. 693706.
  • Güttel, W. H. and S. W. Konlechner (2009). ‘Continuously hanging by a thread: managing contextually ambidextrous organizations’, Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, pp. 149171.
  • Hambrick, D. C., M. A. Geletkanycz and J. W. Fredrickson (1993). ‘Top executive commitment to the status quo: some tests of its determinants’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 401418.
  • Harrison, D. A., K. H. Price and M. P. Bell (1998). ‘Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning’, Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 96107.
  • He, Z. and P. Wong (2004). ‘Exploration and exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis’, Organization Science, 15, pp. 481494.
  • HM Treasury (2003). Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration. London: HM Treasury on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). ‘Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures’, Organization Science, 2, pp. 88115.
  • Hughes, M., P. Hughes and R. E. Morgan (2007). ‘Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: implications for market and response performance’, British Journal of Management, 18, pp. 359375.
  • Hughes, M., S. L. Martin, R. E. Morgan and M. J. Robson (2010). ‘Realizing product-market advantage in high-tech international new ventures: the mediating role of ambidextrous innovation’, Journal of International Marketing, 18, pp. 121.
  • Jackson, S. E., A. Joshi and N. L. Erhardt (2003). ‘Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications’, Journal of Management, 29, pp. 801830.
  • James, L. R., S. A. Mulaik and J. M. Brett (2004). ‘A tale of two methods’. Working Paper, Department of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
  • Jansen, J. J. P., G. George, F. A. J. van den Bosch and H. W. Volberda (2008). ‘Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: the moderating role of transformational leadership’, Journal of Management Studies, 45, pp. 9821007.
  • Jansen, J. J. P., M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. van den Bosch and H. W. Volberda (2009). ‘Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms’, Organization Science, 20, pp. 797811.
  • Jelinek, M. and C. B. Schoonhoven (1993). The Innovation Marathon. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Judge, W. Q. and C. P. Blocke (2008). ‘Organizational capacity for change and strategic ambidexterity: flying the plane while rewiring it’, European Journal of Marketing, 42, pp. 915926.
  • Kang, S.-C. and S. A. Snell (2009). ‘Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management’, Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 6592.
  • Katila, R. and G. Ahuja (2002). ‘Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction’, Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 11831194.
  • Leana, C. R. and H. J. van Buren III (1999). ‘Organizational social capital and employment practices’, Academy of Management Review, 24, pp. 538555.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 111125.
  • Levinthal, D. A. and J. G. March (1993). ‘The myopia of learning’, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue), pp. 95112.
  • Litwin, G. H. and R. A. Stringer (1968). Motivation and Organizational Climate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lubatkin, M. H., Z. Simsek, L. Yan and J. F. Veiga (2006). ‘Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration’, Journal of Management, 32, pp. 646672.
  • Luo, X., K. Sivakumar and S. S. Liu (2005). ‘Globalization, marketing resources, and performance: evidence from China’, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 33, pp. 5065.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S. G. West and V. Sheets (2002). ‘A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects’, Psychological Methods, 7, pp. 83104.
  • March, J. (1991). ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science, 2, pp. 7187.
  • Mazzucato, M. and M. Tancioni (2008). ‘Innovation and idiosyncratic risk: an industry- and firm-level analysis’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, pp. 779811.
  • McGrath, R. G. (2001). ‘Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight’, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 118131.
  • McGrath, R., S. Venkataraman and I. MacMillan (1994). ‘The advantage chain: antecedents to rents from internal corporate venture’, Journal of Business Venturing, 9, pp. 351369.
  • McNamara, P. and C. Baden-Fuller (1999). ‘Lessons from the Celltech case: knowledge exploration and exploitation in organizational renewal’, British Journal of Management, 10, pp. 291293.
  • Menguc, B. and S. Auh (2008). ‘The asymmetric effect of ambidexterity on firm performance for prospectors and defenders: the moderating role of marketing orientation’, Industrial Marketing Management, 37, pp. 455470.
  • NESTA (2007). Policy Briefing: Innovation Goes Global . National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, December, London.
  • OECD (1999). Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (2007). Moving Up the Value Chain: Staying Competitive in the Global Economy. Paris: OECD.
  • O'Reilly, C. A. and M. L. Tushman (2007). ‘Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma’. Working Paper 07-088, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
  • Orton, J. D. and K. E. Weick (1990). ‘Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization’, Academy of Management Review, 15, pp. 203223.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). ‘Markets, bureaucracies, and clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp. 129141.
  • Patterson, M. G., M. A. West, V. J. Shackleton, J. F. Dawson, R. Lawthom, S. Maitlis, D. L. Robinson andA. M. Wallace (2005). ‘Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices productivity and innovation’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, pp. 379408.
  • Peng, M. W. and P. S. Heath (1996). ‘The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice’, Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 492528.
  • Podsakoff, P. M. and D. W. Organ (1986). ‘Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects’, Journal of Management, 12, pp. 531544.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Lee and N. Podsakoff (2003). ‘Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp. 879903.
  • Raisch, S., J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst and M. L. Tushman (2009). ‘Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance’, Organization Science, 20, pp. 685695.
  • Reynolds, W. M. (1982). ‘Development of valid and reliable short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, pp. 119125.
  • Rink, F. and N. Ellemers (2007). ‘Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: the norm congruity principle’, British Journal of Management, 18, pp. S17S27.
  • Roy, A., P. G. Walters and S. T. Luk (2001). ‘Chinese puzzles and paradoxes: conducting business research in China’, Journal of Business Research, 52, pp. 203210.
  • Schein, E. H. (1990). ‘Organizational culture’, American Psychologist, 45, pp. 109119.
  • Schneider, B., M. G. Ehrhart, D. M. Mayer, J. L. Saltz and K. Niles-Jolly (2005). ‘Understanding organization–customer links in service settings’, Academy of Management Journal, 48, pp. 10171032.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
  • Simsek, Z. (2009). ‘Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding’, Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 597624.
  • Simsek, Z., C. Heavey, J. F. Veiga and D. Souder (2009). ‘A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes’, Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 864893.
  • Sinkula, J. M., W. E. Baker and T. Noordewier (1997). ‘A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, pp. 305318.
  • Spector, P. E. (1987). ‘Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, pp. 438443.
  • Tellis, G. J., J. C. Prahbu and R. K. Chandy (2009). ‘Radical innovation across nations: the preeminence of corporate culture’, Journal of Marketing, 73, pp. 323.
  • Thompson, J. D. and A. Tuden (1959). ‘Strategies, structure and processes of organizational decision’. In J. D. Thompson , P. B. Hammond and R. W. Hawkes (eds), Comparative Studies in Administration, pp. 195216. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Tiwana, A. (2008). ‘Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity’, Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 251272.
  • Tsai, W. and S. Ghoshal (1998). ‘Social capital and value creation: the role of intra-firm networks’, Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 464476.
  • Tushman, M. L. and C. A. O'Reilly (1996). ‘Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change’, California Management Review, 38, pp. 829.
  • Tushman, M. L. and C. A. O'Reilly III (1997). Winning through Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Wang, P., C. H. Wee and P. H. Koh (1998). ‘Control mechanisms, key personnel appointment, control and performance of Sino–Singapore joint ventures’, International Business Review, 4, pp. 351375.
  • Whitcomb, L. L., C. B. Erdener and C. Li (1998). ‘Business ethical values in China and the U.S.’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, pp. 839852.
  • Wilkins, A. L. and W. G. Ouchi (1983). ‘Efficient cultures: exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp. 468481.
  • Williams, K. Y. and C. A. O'Reilly (1998). ‘Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years research’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, pp. 77140.
  • Yam, R. C. M., J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun and E. P. Y. Tang (2004). ‘An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China’, Research Policy, 33, pp. 11231140.
  • Yang, H. and K. Atuahene-Gima (2007). ‘Ambidexterity in product innovation management: the direct and contingent effects on product development performance’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Zhao, X., B. B. Flynn and A. V. Roth (2006). ‘Decision sciences research in China: a critical review and research agenda – foundations and overview’, Decision Sciences, 37, pp. 451496.