Preparation of this article and the analyses were supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH67300) and William T. Grant Foundation. Data collection for the Virgina 30,000 data set was supported by Grants GM-30250, AG-04954, AA-06781, MH-40828, and HL-48148 from the National Institutes of Health and a gift from RJR Nabisco.
Analysis and Interpretation of Twin Studies Including Measures of the Shared Environment
Article first published online: 4 FEB 2005
Volume 76, Issue 6, pages 1217–1233, November 2005
How to Cite
Turkheimer, E., D'Onofrio, B. M., Maes, H. H. and Eaves, L. J. (2005), Analysis and Interpretation of Twin Studies Including Measures of the Shared Environment. Child Development, 76: 1217–1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00845.x-i1
- Issue published online: 4 FEB 2005
- Article first published online: 4 FEB 2005
Recent reports using a classical behavior genetic research design in which twin data are combined with a measured characteristic of their shared family environment have made striking claims about estimating environmental influences on behavior with genetic effects controlled. Such claims are overstated for two related reasons. First, when a variable is measured at the family level in a way that makes it necessarily equivalent for twins reared together, it is not possible to partition it into genetic and environmental components. Second, although structural equation modeling and DeFries–Fulker analysis are sound tools for the analysis of many types of twin data, they do not control for genetic or environmental confounds when estimating the effect of measured family-level variables.