Get access

Defending Qualitative Change: The View From Dynamical Systems Theory

Authors

  • John P. Spencer,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Iowa and Iowa Center for Developmental and Learning Sciences
      concerning this article should be addressed to John P. Spencer, 11 Seashore Hall E, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. Electronic mail may be sent to john-spencer@uiowa.edu.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sammy Perone

    1. University of Iowa
    Search for more papers by this author

  • We would like to thank Gregor Schöner and Larissa Samuelson for helpful discussions and comments on an earlier version of this article. This work was supported by National Science Foundation HSD 0527698 awarded to J.P.S.

concerning this article should be addressed to John P. Spencer, 11 Seashore Hall E, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. Electronic mail may be sent to john-spencer@uiowa.edu.

Abstract

A central controversy in developmental science, enflamed by nativist accounts, is whether development is best viewed as a series of qualitative or continuous changes. This article defends the notion of qualitative change from the perspective of dynamical systems theory (DST). Qualitative change within DST refers to the shift that occurs when a system goes from one attractor state through an instability into a different attractor state. Such changes occur on the second-to-second timescale of behavior. Thus, developmental analysis must always stay local, grounded in the real-time attractor states around which behavior is organized. This article also demonstrates that qualitative and continuous change should not be cast in opposition. They are aligned concepts that work together across multiple timescales.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary