Financial support was provided by UNICEF Bosnia & Herzegovina, the BYU Family Studies Center, the David M. Kennedy Center for International Studies, the Bing Fund, and Tony Bennett. The authors thank Preston Finley, James Wu, Ann Anderson, and Jenifer Alonso for assisting with manuscript preparation. Special thanks to Theresa Betancourt, Alan Steinberg, Sarah Ostrowski, Harolyn Belcher, and two anonymous reviewers for their generous and insightful comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Unpacking Trauma Exposure Risk Factors and Differential Pathways of Influence: Predicting Postwar Mental Distress in Bosnian Adolescents
Article first published online: 15 JUL 2010
© 2010, Copyright the Author(s). Journal Compilation © 2010, Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
Volume 81, Issue 4, pages 1053–1076, July/August 2010
How to Cite
Layne, C. M., Olsen, J. A., Baker, A., Legerski, J.-P., Isakson, B., Pašalić, A., Duraković-Belko, E., Đapo, N., Ćampara, N., Arslanagić, B., Saltzman, W. R. and Pynoos, R. S. (2010), Unpacking Trauma Exposure Risk Factors and Differential Pathways of Influence: Predicting Postwar Mental Distress in Bosnian Adolescents. Child Development, 81: 1053–1076. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01454.x
- Issue published online: 15 JUL 2010
- Article first published online: 15 JUL 2010
Methods are needed for quantifying the potency and differential effects of risk factors to identify at-risk groups for theory building and intervention. Traditional methods for constructing war exposure measures are poorly suited to “unpack” differential relations between specific types of exposure and specific outcomes. This study of 881 Bosnian adolescents compared both common factor–effect indicator (using exploratory factor analysis) versus composite causal–indicator methods for “unpacking” dimensions of war exposure and their respective paths to postwar adjustment outcomes. The composite method better supported theory building and most intervention applications, showing how multitiered interventions can enhance treatment effectiveness and efficiency in war settings. Used together, the methods may unpack the elements and differential effects of “caravans” of risk and promotive factors that co-occur across development.