The data reported here were collected in partial fulfillment of a doctoral thesis conducted by the first author under the supervision of the second author. We are grateful to the parents and children who volunteered their time to participate and to the Penn State Families Interested in Research Studies group for access to their participant database. We thank Adam Christensen, Mike Kilcoyne, Jen Lyons, Lauren Biga, Kelly Hayduk, Megan Bibey, Kimberly Yingling, Katie Freet, and Lauren Sasaki for their valuable assistance in various phases of this work, and Rick Gilmore, Richard Carlson, Carol Miller, and Michael Chandler for their many insightful suggestions. This work was funded in part by Penn State Psychology Department grants awarded to Lauren Myers from the Bruce V. Moore Fund and the Child Study Center’s Faris Endowment. No endorsement of this research by any funding agency or source is implied. Portions of this research were presented at the 2009 biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO.
Graphic Symbols as “The Mind on Paper”: Links Between Children’s Interpretive Theory of Mind and Symbol Understanding
Article first published online: 20 DEC 2011
© 2011 The Authors. Child Development © 2011 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
Volume 83, Issue 1, pages 186–202, January/February 2012
How to Cite
Myers, L. J. and Liben, L. S. (2012), Graphic Symbols as “The Mind on Paper”: Links Between Children’s Interpretive Theory of Mind and Symbol Understanding. Child Development, 83: 186–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01693.x
- Issue published online: 25 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 20 DEC 2011
This article has been cited by:
- 1Navigating Maps to Support Comprehension: When Textbooks Don't Have GPS, The Geography Teacher, 2014, 11, 4, 149, ,
- 2When this means that: The role of working memory and inhibitory control in children’s understanding of representations, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2013, 116, 2, 169, , , ,