We are grateful to all the children for their generous participation and thank the Wellington Kindergarten Association for their support throughout. We thank Penny Tok and Bo Wang for assistance with data collection and two anonymous reviewers for their theoretical and methodological suggestions for improving the article.
Effects of Labeling on Preschoolers’ Explicit False Belief Performance: Outcomes of Cognitive Flexibility or Inhibitory Control?
Article first published online: 24 FEB 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Child Development © 2012 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
Volume 83, Issue 3, pages 1072–1084, May/June 2012
How to Cite
Low, J. and Simpson, S. (2012), Effects of Labeling on Preschoolers’ Explicit False Belief Performance: Outcomes of Cognitive Flexibility or Inhibitory Control?. Child Development, 83: 1072–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01738.x
- Issue published online: 1 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 24 FEB 2012
Executive function mechanisms underpinning language-related effects on theory of mind understanding were examined in a sample of 165 preschoolers. Verbal labels were manipulated to identify relevant perspectives on an explicit false belief task. In Experiment 1 with 4-year-olds (N = 74), false belief reasoning was superior in the fully and protagonist-perspective labeled conditions compared to the child-perspective and nondescript labeling conditions. In Experiment 2 with 3-year-olds (N = 53), labeling the nondominant belief only biased attentional inertia. In Experiment 3 testing generalization in 4-year-olds (N = 38), labeling manipulations translated to improved performance on a second label-free explicit false belief task. These outcomes fit a cognitive flexibility account whereby age changes in the effects of labeling turn on formulating sophisticated conceptual representations.