SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aaronson, S. and Reeves, J. (2002) The European Response to Public Demands for Global Corporate Responsibility. National Policy Association. http://www.bitc.org.uk/docs/NPA_Global_CSR_survey.pdf, accessed November 3, 2003.
  • Aguilera, R. and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004) Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the tTrigger?, Organization Studies, 25(3): 41543.
  • Albert, M. (1991) Capitalisme Contre Capitalisme, LeSeuil, Paris.
  • Alexander, J. (1997) On the right side, World Business, 3(1): 3841.
  • Bauman, Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Beyer, Jurgen and Hassel, Anke (2002) The effects of convergence: Internationalization and the changing distribution of net value in large German firms, Economy and Society, 31(3): 30932.
  • Bondy, K., Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2004) The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs – A three countries comparative study, Business and Society Review, 109(4): 44977.
  • Burke, K. S. (2002) Regulation corporate governance through the market: Comparing the approaches of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, The Journal of Corporation Law, 27(3): 34180.
  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Gower Publishing, England.
  • Chapple, W. and Moon, J. (2005) CSR in Asia: A seven country study of CSR website reporting, Business and Society, 44(4): 41541.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2001) The rise of dispersed ownership: The roles of law and the state in the Separation of ownership and control, The Yale Law Journal, 111(1): 182.
  • Coupland, C. (2003) Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Web-based Reports: Currency in the Banking Sector? In: European Critical Accounting Studies Conference, St. Andrews University.
  • Coupland, C. and Brown, A. D. (2004) Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch-Shell, Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 132547.
  • Cowton, C. (1998) The use of secondary data in business ethics research, Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 42334.
  • Crane, A. (1999) Are you ethical? Please tick yes or no, Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3): 23748.
  • Crane, A. (2000) Corporate Greening as amoralization, Organization Studies, 21(4): 67396.
  • Davis, K. (1973) The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities, Academy of Management Review, 16: 31223.
  • De Andres, P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F. (2005) Corporate boards in OECD Countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2): 197210.
  • Dickerson, C. and Hagen, K. (1998) Corporate Codes of Conduct. In: American Society of International Law, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Washington, 26577.
  • Diller, J. (1999) A social conscience in the global marketplace? Labor dimensions of codes of conduct, social labeling and investor initiatives, International Labor Review, 138(2): 99129.
  • Donnelly, S., Gamble, A., Jackson, G., and Parkinson, J. (2000) The Public Interest and the Company in Britain and Germany, Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society. Available at http://www.agf.org.uk/pubs/pdfs/r1215e.pdf, accessed February 5, 2004.
  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989) Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 53250.
  • Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford.
  • Ellis, R. (2004) Presentation and Comments. In: International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility CSR: Substance or Spin, Nottingham, UK, April 28, 2004. University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
  • Ferner, A. and Quintanilla, J. (1998) Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: The enduring influence of national identity or a process of “Anglo-Saxonization,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4): 71031.
  • Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J. and Varul, M. Z. (2001) Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain, Journal of World Business, 36(2):10727.
  • Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. (2004) The diffusion of ideas over-contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 50134.
  • Forcese, C. (1997) Commerce with Conscience: Human Rights and Corporate Codes of Conduct, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, Montreal.
  • Guler, I., Guillén, M. and MacPherson, J.M. (2002) Global competition, institutions and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality Ccertificates, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 20732.
  • International Labor Organization (ILO) (n.d.a) Corporate codes of conduct, ILO Bureau for Workers' Activities, http://www.itcilo.it/english/actrav/telearn/global/ilo/code/main.htm date accessed March 17, 2004.
  • International Labor Organization (ILO) (n.d.b) Codes of conduct for multinationals, ILO Bureau for Workers' Activities, http://www.itcilo.it/english/actrav/telearn/global/ilo/code/main.htm, accessed March 17, 2004.
  • Kaptein, M. and Wempe, J. (2002) The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. and Welters, C. (1999) International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: Can transnational corporations regulate themselves?, Transnational Corporations, 8(1): 14380.
  • Lane, C. (1992) European Business Systems: Britain and Germany Compared. In: Whitley, R., (ed.) European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, Sage, London.
  • Langlois, C. and Schlegelmilch, B. (1990) Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4): 51939.
  • Lenox, M. and Nash, J. (2003) Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade sssociation programs, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12: 34356.
  • Maignan, I. and Ralston, D. (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses' self-fresentations, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 49714.
  • Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for A comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 33(2): forthcoming.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Private Initiatives for Corporate Responsibility: An Analysis, OECD Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M000013000/M00013735.pdf, accessed January 22, 2002.
  • Powell, M. and DiMaggio, P. (eds) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Proffitt, W. T. and Spicer, A. (2006) Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: Institutional investors and global social issues, Strategic Organization, 4(2): 16590.
  • Sethi, P. (2002) Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations, Business and Society Review, 107(1): 2040.
  • Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction, Sage, London.
  • Spiggle, S. (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 21: 491503.
  • United States Council for International Business United States Council for International Business, http://www.uscib.org/index.asp?documentID=1434, accessed March 17, 2004.
  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons, Trans.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Weimer, J. and Pape, J. C. (1999) A taxonomy of Systems of Corporate governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(2): 15266.
  • Whitley, R. (1998) Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: The limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems, Review of International Political Economy, 5(3): 44581.