SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Adams, S. M. & Flynn, P. M. 2005. Local knowledge advances women's access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13: 836846.
  • Arkes, H. R., Dawes, R. M., & Christensen, C. 1986. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37: 93110.
  • Baker, W. E. 1990. The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89: 775811.
  • Baker, H. K. & Nofsinger, J. R. 2002. Psychological biases of investors. Financial Services Review, 11: 97116.
  • Banerjee, A. V. 1992. A Simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 797817.
  • Bantel, K. A. 1993a. Strategic clarity in banking – Role of top management-team demography. Psychological Reports, 73: 11871201.
  • Bantel, K. A. 1993b. Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic-planning formality. Group & Organization Management, 18: 436458.
  • Bantel, K. A. & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking – Does the composition of the top team make a difference. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107124.
  • Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. 2001. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 261292.
  • Barnes, T. R., Bolliger, L., Cepeda, A., & Sykes, D. 2007. Expanding diversity in the boardroom. The Corporate Governance Advisor, 15: 14.
  • Bar-Yosef, S. & Venezia, I. 2006. An experimental study of overconfidence in accounting numbers predictions. Hebrew University Working Paper.
  • Basov, S., Blanckenberg, L., & Gangadharan, L. 2007. Behavioural anomalies, bounded rationality and simple heuristics. University of Melbourne, Research Paper 1012.
  • Baumann, A. O., Deber, R. B., & Thompson, G. G. 1991. Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: the micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty phenomenon. Social Science & Medicine, 32: 167174.
  • Beckmann, D. & Menkhoff, L. 2008. Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. Kyklos, 61: 364384.
  • Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. 2007. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. SSRN Working Paper.
  • Bertrand, M. & Schoar, A. 2003. Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 11691208.
  • Bessant, J. & Tidd, J. 2007. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
  • Biais, B. & Weber, M. 2007. Hindsight bias and investment performance. Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI). Working Papers Nr. 476.
  • Bliss, R. T. & Rosen, R. J. 2001. Ceo compensation and bank mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 61: 107138.
  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. 2007. Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 393403.
  • Brewer, M. B. 1995. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S.Jackson & M. N.Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity inwork teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace: 4768. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. 1999. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 267383.
  • Camerer, C. & Lovallo, D. 1999. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 89: 306318.
  • Campbell, K. & Minguez-Vera, A. 2008. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 435451.
  • Campbell, K. & Mínguez-Vera, A. 2009. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 435451.
  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30: 749778.
  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38: 3353.
  • Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2006. Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 813839.
  • Chang, C. J. & Ho, J. L. Y. 2004. Judgment and decision making in project continuation: A study of students as surrogates for experienced managers. Abacus, 40: 94116.
  • Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. & Bushyhead, J. B. 1981. Physicians' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7: 928935.
  • Cohen, W. L. & Levinthal, D. M. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quaterly, 35: 128152.
  • Coleman, J. 1990. The foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. W., & Dunkelberg, W. C. 1988. Entrepeneurs' perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 97108.
  • Coser, K. 1956. The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Coval, J. & Moskowitz, T. 1999. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54: 16951704.
  • Cox, T. 1993. Cultural diversity in organizations. Theory, research & practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Crisp, R. J., Ensari, N., Hewstone, M., & Miller, N. W. 2002. A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology: 3574. Hove, UK/Philadelphia, PA: Psychological Press.
  • Cyert, R. & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 11071123.
  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. 1999. A decade of corporate women: some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 9399.
  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Rajagopalan, N. 2003. Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 151158.
  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269290.
  • Davey, G. C. L. 1994. Pathological worrying as excerbated problem-solving. In G. C. L.Davey & F.Tallis (Eds.), Worrying; perspectives on theory, assessment, and treatment: 3559. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Dawes, R. M. 1988. Rational choice in an uncertain world. San Diego and New York: Harcourt, Brace, Yovanovich.
  • De Wit, F. R. C. & Greer, L. L. 2008. The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 68th Annual Meeting, Anaheim, USA.
  • Deaves, R., Lüders, E., & Schröder, M. 2005. The dynamics of overconfidence: evidence from stock market forecasters. Centre for European Economic Research Working Paper.
  • Deutsch, M. 1969. Conflicts: productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues, 25: 741.
  • Devers, C. E., Wiseman, R. M., & Holmes, M. R. J. 2007. The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 191208.
  • DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited – Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147160.
  • Doukas, J. A. & Petzemas, D. 2007. Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias. European Financial Management, 13: 531577.
  • Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. 2005. Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26: 779792.
  • Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. 2002. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23: 281295.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast decisions in bigbvelocity environments. Academy of Management Joumal, 32: 543576.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. Organizational growth – Linking founding teams, strategy, environment, and growth among united states seminconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 504529.
  • Eiser, J. R. 1986. Social psychology: Attitudes, cognition, and social behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Elliott, W. B., Hodge, F. D., Kennedy, J. J., & Pronk, M. 2007. Are M.B.A. students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors? The Accounting Review, 82: 139168.
  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75: 643669.
  • Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. 2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11: 102111.
  • Fama, E. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25: 383402.
  • Fehr-Duda, H., De Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. 2006. Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60 (with Helga Fehr-Duda and Manuele De Gennaro): 283313.
  • Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484503.
  • Fischhoff, B. & Beyth, R. 1975. “I knew it would happen”: remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 116.
  • Flap, H. D. 1988. Conflict, loyalty, and violence. Frankfurt.
  • Fox, C. R. & Clemen, R. T. 2005. Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Science, 51: 14171432.
  • Fox, C. R. & Hadar, L. 2006. “Decisions from experience” = sampling error plus prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment and Decision Making Journal, 1: 159161.
  • Fox, C. R. & Tversky, A. 1995. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 585603.
  • Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagne, B. 2008. Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 8395.
  • French, K. & Poterba, J. 1991. Investor diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Review, 81: 222226.
  • Frey, B. S. & Benz, M. 2004. From imperialism to inspiration: A survey of economics and psychology. In J. B.Davis, A.Marciano, & J.Runde (Eds.), The elgar companion to economics and philosophy: 6184. Cornwall: Edward Elgar.
  • Gettier, E. 1963. Is justefied true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23: 121123.
  • Gonzalez, M., Modernell, R., & Paris, E. 2006. Herding behaviour inside the board: An experimental approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 388405.
  • Griffin, D. & Tversky, A. 1992. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24: 411435.
  • Grinblatt, M. & Keloharju, M. 2001. How distance, language and culture infuence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance, 56: 10531073.
  • Gysler, M., Brown Kruse, J., & Schubert, R. 2002. Ambiguity and gender differences in financial decision making: An experimental examination of competence and confidence effects. Center for Economic Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Working Paper.
  • Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32: 334343.
  • Hambrick, D. C. & Finkelstein, S. 1987. Managerial discretion – A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 369406.
  • Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons – The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193206.
  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. A. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659684.
  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. 2005. Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30: 472491.
  • Hammond, J., Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. 1998. The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, 76: 4758.
  • Harrison, G. W. & List, J. A. 2004. Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42: 10091055.
  • Hayward, M. L. A. & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103127.
  • Hayward, M. L. A., Shepherd, D. A., & Griffin, D. 2006. A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52: 160172.
  • Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quaterly, 35: 930.
  • Hiller, N. J. & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (Hyper-)Core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 297319.
  • Von Holstein, C. S. 1972. Probabilistic forecasting: An experiment related to the stock market. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8: 139158.
  • Hribar, P. & Yang, H. 2006. Ceo overconfidence, management earnings forecasts, and earnings management. Working paper, Cornell University.
  • Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of groupthink. A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Kahneman, D. & Lovallo, D. 1993. Timid choices and bold forecasts – A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science, 39: 1731.
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1973. Psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80: 237251.
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263291.
  • Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. 2007. Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 194207.
  • Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. 1966. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Kaustia, M. & Knüpfer, S. 2008. Do investors overweight personal experience? Evidence from ipo subscriptions. Journal of Finance, 63: 26792702.
  • Keck, S. 1997. Top management team structure: differential effects of environmental context. Organization Science, 8: 143156.
  • Kidd, J. B. 1970. The utilization of subjective probabilities in production planning. Acta Psychologica.
  • Klimoski, R. & Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20: 403437.
  • Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., & Flood, P. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 445465.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. & Schippers, M. C. 2007. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 515541.
  • Kopstein, A. N., Crum, R. M., Celentano, D. D., & Martin, S. S. 2001. Sensation seeking needs among 8th and 11th graders: characteristics associated with cigarette and marijuana use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 62: 195203.
  • Langer, E. J. 1975. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 311328.
  • Lazear, E. P. 2004. Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 94: 208211.
  • Leahy, R. L. 1992. Cognitive therapy on Wall Street: Schemas and scripts of invulnerability. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 6: 114.
  • Lewellen, W. G., Lease, R. C., & Schlarbaum, G. G. 1977. Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. Journal of Business, 50: 296333.
  • Li, J. T. & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 794813.
  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. S. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127: 267286.
  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32: 646672.
  • Madrian, B. & Shea, D. 2001. The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(K) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 11491525.
  • Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. 2003. Who makes acquisitions? Ceo overconfidence and the market's reaction. NBER Working Paper, No. 10813.
  • Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. 2005. Ceo overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60: 26612700.
  • Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. 2008. Who makes acquisitions? Ceo overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89: 2043.
  • March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York, London: Wiley; Chapman & Hall.
  • Massa, M. & Simonov, A. 2006. Hedging, familiarity and portfolio choice. Review of Financial Studies, 19: 633685.
  • Michel, J. G. & Hambrick, D. C. 1992. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 937.
  • Miller, D. & Droge, C. 1986. Psycholgical and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 539560.
  • Mintzberg, H. 1973. New look at chief executives job. Organizational Dynamics, 1: 2030.
  • Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. 1987. Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Murphy, K. J. 1999. Executive compensation. In O.Ashenfelter & D.Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics: 24852563. Amsterdam.
  • Murray, A. I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 125141.
  • Naqvi, N., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. 2006. The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychological Science, 15: 260264.
  • Oskamp, S. 1965. Overconfidence in case study judgements. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29: 261265.
  • Paese, P. W. & Feuer, M. A. 1991. Decisions, actions, and the appropriateness of confidence in knowledge. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4: 116.
  • Pagano, M., Roell, A. A., & Zechner, J. 2002. The geography of equity listing: Why do companies list abroad? Journal of Finance, 67: 26512694.
  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 128.
  • Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Caringal, C. 2006. Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 31: 175196.
  • Prahalad, C. K., Bettis, R., & Ricciardi 1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 485501.
  • Ricciardi, V. 2004. A risk perception primer: A narrative research review of the risk perception literature in behavioral accounting and behavioral finance. SSRN Working Papers.
  • Ricciardi, V. 2008. The financial psychology of worry and women. SSRN Working Paper.
  • Ricciardi, V. & Simon, H. K. 2000. What is behavioral finance? Business, Education and Technology Journal, 2: 29.
  • Ricciardi, V. & Simon, H. K. 2001. Behavioral finance: a new perspective for investors and financial professionals. Working Paper.
  • Robichaud, M., Dugas, M. J., & Conway, M. 2003. Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17: 501516.
  • Roll, R. 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59: 197216.
  • Rose, C. 2007. Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 404413.
  • Rost, K. & Osterloh, M. 2008. You pay a fee for strong beliefs: homogeneity as a driver of corporate governance failure. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304719.
  • Rost, K., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. 2007. Promotor and champions? Pros and cons of the division of labour for economic progress. Schmalenbach Business Review, 10: 340363.
  • Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. 2006. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: evidence from swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 12011226.
  • Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1: 759.
  • Schubert, R. 2006. Analyzing and managing risks – On the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32: 706715.
  • Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. 1999. Financial decision making: Are women really more risk Averse? Gender and economic transactions. The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 89: 381385.
  • Sheridan, A. & Milgate, G. 2005. Accessing board positions: A comparison of female and male board members' views. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13: 847855.
  • Simon, H. A. 1985. Human nature in politics – The dialog of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79: 293304.
  • Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662673.
  • Sjöberg, L. 2009. Are all crowds equally wise? A comparison of political election forecasts by experts and the public. Journal of Forecasting, 28: 118.
  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. 1985. Characterizing perceived risk. In R. W.Kates, C.Hohenemser, & J. X.Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: technology as hazard: 91123. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Spense, M. T. 1996. Problem-problem solver characteristics affecting the calibration of judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67: 271279.
  • Steverman, B. & Bogoslaw, D. 2008-10-11. The financial crisis blame game. Business Week.
  • Strong, N. C. & Xu, X. 2003. Understanding the equity home bias: Evidence from survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 307312.
  • Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.
  • Thaler, R. H. 1992. The winner's curse. Paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. New York: Free Press.
  • Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26: 11571177.
  • Turner, M. E. & Pratkanis, A. R. 1998. Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73: 105115.
  • Tuschke, A. & Sanders, W. G. 2003. Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance reform: The case of Germany. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 631649.
  • Tushman, M. L. & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439465.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty – heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 11241131.
  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 42: 3567.
  • Wagner, A. M. & Houlihan, D. D. 1994. Sensation seeking and trait anxiety in hangglider pilots and golfers. Personality and Individual Differences, 16: 975977.
  • Van Der Walt, N. & Ingley, C. 2003. Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11: 218234.
  • Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Wiersema, M. F. & Bantel, K. A. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 91121.
  • Zuckerman, M. 1979. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimum level of arousal. Erlbaum: Hillsdale.