SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F. & Karpoff, J. M. 1999. Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 42: 309342.
  • Aguilera, R. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2009. Codes of good governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 376387.
  • Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for "Lemons:" Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 488500.
  • AMF 2004. Sur le gouvernement d'entreprise et les procédures de contrôle interne des émetteurs faisant appel public à l'épargne. Paris: AMF.
  • Aste, L. 1999. Reforming French corporate governance: A return to the two-tier board? The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 32: 172.
  • Bank of France Bulletin 2004. La détention du capital des entreprises françaises du CAC 40 par les non-résidents de 1997–2002. Issue n°124.
  • Barron, D. 1992. The analysis of count data: Overdispersion and autocorrelation. Sociological Methodology, 22: 179220.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Freeman, L. C. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. URL.
  • Bouton, D. (coord.) 2002.Pour un meilleur gouvernement des entreprises cotées. Rapport du groupe de travail. Paris: AFEP-AGREF / MEDEF.
  • Bowerman, B. L. & O'Connell, R. T. 1990. 2nd edn. Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Belmont: Duxbury.
  • Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 301312.
  • Brass, D. J. & Burkhardt, M. E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal., 36: 441470.
  • Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M. & Michaud, C. 2000. The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11: 123147.
  • Cadbury, A. 1992. Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee and Co.
  • Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28: 432446.
  • Christiansen, H. & Koldertsova, A. 2009. The role of stock exchanges in corporate governance. Financial Market Trends, 2009: 191220.
  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H. & Lang, L. H. P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57: 27412771.
  • Coles, J. L. & Hoi, C. 2003. New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310. Journal of Finance., 58: 197230.
  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. & Aguilera, R. 2004. The worldwide diffusion of codes of good governance. In A.Grandori (Ed.), Corporate governance and firm organization: 318349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E. & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269290.
  • Davis, G. F. & Greve, H. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 137.
  • Davis, G. F. & Thompson, T. A. 1994. A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 141173.
  • DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In W. W.Powell & P. J.DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 267292. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288307.
  • Feldman, M. S. & March, J. G. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 171186.
  • Fich, E. M. & Shivdasani, A. 2007. Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 86: 306336.
  • Fiss, P. C. 2008. Institutions and corporate governance. In R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin & R.Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism: 389410. London: Sage Publications.
  • Fombrun, C. & Shanley, M. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233258.
  • Freeman, L. 1979. Centrality in Social Networks. Social Networks, 1: 215239.
  • Garcia Osma, B. & Gill-de-Albornoz Noguer, B. 2007. The effect of the board composition and its monitoring committees on earnings management: Evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 14131428.
  • Geletkanycz, M. A., Boyd, B. K. & Finkelstein, S. 2001. The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal., 22: 889898.
  • Helland, E. 2006. Reputational penalties and the merits of class-action securities litigation. Journal of Law and Economics, 49: 365395.
  • Hermalin, B. E. & Weisbach, M. S. 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88: 96118.
  • Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: HM Stationery Office.
  • Hillman, A. J. & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383396.
  • Huse, M. 2007. Boards, governance, and value creation: The human side of corporate governance. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305360.
  • Kadushin, C. 1995. Friendship among the French financial elite. American Sociological Review, 60: 202221.
  • Kim, Y. & Cannella, A. A. 2008. Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 282293.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54: 471517.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 11131155.
  • Leblanc, R. & Schwartz, M. 2007. The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 843851.
  • Lorsch, J. W. & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • McGuire, J., Sundgren, A. & Schneeweis, T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy Management Journal, 31: 854872.
  • Maclean, M., Harvey, C. & Press, J. 2006. Business elites and corporate governance in France and the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Markarian, G. & Parbonetti, A. 2007. Firm complexity and board of director composition. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 12241243.
  • Mizruchi, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 271298.
  • Monks, R. & Minow, N. 2004. Corporate governance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Myers, R. 1990. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd edn. Boston: Duxbury.
  • North, D. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 97112.
  • Palmer, D. 1983. Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and inter-corporate coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 4055.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163182.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. & McNulty, T. 1995. Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations, 48: 845873.
  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
  • Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimization, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (special issue): 2944.
  • Rediker, K. & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 8599.
  • Richardson, R. J. 1987. Directorship interlock and corporate profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 367386.
  • Roe, M. J. 1994. Strong managers, weak owners: The political roots of American corporate finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review., 22: 887910.
  • Shivdasani, A. & Yermack, D. 1999. CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54: 18291853.
  • Spence, A. M. 1974. Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • The Combined Code 2000. Principles of good governance and code of best practice. London: The Department of Trade and Industry.
  • The Working Group on Corporate Governance 1991. A new compact for owners and directors. Harvard Business Review, (69): 141143.
  • US Congress 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Paper presented at 107th Congress of the United States of America. H.R. 3763. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Vienot, M. (coord.) 1995. Le Conseil d'administration des sociétés cotées. Paris: AFEP / CNPF.
  • Vienot, M. (coord.) 1999. Rapport du comité sur le gouvernement d'entreprise. Paris: AFEP / MEDEF.
  • Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 431460.
  • Westphal, J. D. & Zajac, E. J. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 6083.
  • Zahra, S. & Pierce, J. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15: 291244.
  • Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Director reputation, CEO /board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 507529.
  • Zattoni, A. & Cuomo, F. 2008. Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 115.