SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albert, S. (1999) E-Commerce Revitalizes ‘Co-Opetition’. Computerworld, 33, 36.
  • Ardichvili, A. (2008) Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 54154.
  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V. and Wentling, T. (2003) Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-Sharing Communities of Practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 6477.
  • Bengtson, M. and Kock, S. (2003) Tension in Co-Opetition. Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference, Washington, D.C.
  • Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. (1996) Co-Opetition. Doubleday/Currency, New York.
  • Brown, J., Broderick, A.J. and Lee, N. (2007) Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 220.
  • Bullinger, A.C., Neyer, A.-K., Rass, M. and Moeslein, K.M. (2010) Community-Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 290303.
  • Burnett, S. and Illingworth, L. (2008) Anonymous Knowledge Sharing in a Virtual Environment: A Preliminary Investigation. Knowledge and Process Management, 15, 111.
  • Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C. and Valentini, G. (2009) Organising R&D Projects to Profit from Innovation: Insights from Co-Opetition. Long Range Planning, 42, 21633.
  • Che, Y.-K. and Gale, I. (2003) Optimal Design of Research Contests. American Economic Review, 93, 64671.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003) The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 3541.
  • Dahan, E. and Hauser, J. (2002) The Virtual Customer. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 33253.
  • Daugherty, T., Lee, W.-N., Gangadharbatla, H., Kim, K. and Outhavong, S. (2005) Organizational Virtual Communities: Exploring Motivations Behind Online Panel Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, article 9.
  • David, P.A. and Shapiro, J.S. (2008) Community-Based Production of Open-Source Software: What Do We Know About the Developers Who Participate? Information Economics and Policy, 20, 36498.
  • Dawson, S. (2010) ‘Seeing’ the Learning Community: An Exploration of the Development of a Resource for Monitoring Online Student Networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 73652.
  • Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) Entering the Field of Qualitative Research. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 117.
  • Dwyer, P. (2007) Measuring the Value of Electronic Word of Mouth and Its Impact in Consumer Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 6379.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building Theories from Case-Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 53250.
  • Faems, D., Janssens, M. and Van Looy, B. (2010) Managing the Co-operation-Competition Dilemma in R&D Alliances: A Multiple Case Study in the Advanced Materials Industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 322.
  • Franke, N. and Shah, S. (2003) How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing among End-Users. Research Policy, 32, 15778.
  • Freeman, L.C. (1979) Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 21539.
  • Füller, J. (2006) Why Consumers Engage in Virtual New Product Developments Initiated by Producers. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 63946.
  • Füller, J., Jawecki, G. and Mühlbacher, H. (2007) Innovation Creation by Online Basketball Communities. Journal of Business Research, 60, 6071.
  • Fullerton, R., Linster, B.G., McKee, M. and Slate, S. (1999) An Experimental Investigation of Research Tournaments. Economic Inquiry, 37, 62436.
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. De Gruyter, New York.
  • Gleave, E., Welser, T., Lento, T. and Smith, M. (2009) A Conceptual and Operation Definition of ‘Social Role’ in Online Community. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 65367.
  • Granovetter, M. (2005) The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 3350.
  • Hamel, G. (1991) Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within International Strategie Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83103.
  • Harhoff, D., Henkel, J. and von Hippel, E. (2003) Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing their Innovations. Research Policy, 32, 175369.
  • Hars, A. and Ou, S. (2002) Working for Free? Motivations for Participation in Open-Source Projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2539.
  • Hautz, J., Hutter, K., Füller, J., Matzler, K. and Rieger, M. (2010) How to Establish an Online Innovation Community? The Role of Users and their Innovative Content. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
  • Hemetsberger, A. (2002) Fostering Cooperation on the Internet: Social Exchange Processes in Innovative Virtual Consumer Communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 35456.
  • Hemetsberger, A. and Reinhardt, C. (2006) Learning and Knowledge-Building in Open-Source Communities – a Social-Experiential Approach. Management Learning, 37, 187214.
  • Hemp, P. (2006) Avatar-Based Marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84, 4857.
  • Hertel, G., Niedner, S. and Herrmann, S. (2003) Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: An Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel. Research Policy, 32, 115977.
  • Hinds, D. and Lee, M.R. (2008) Social Network Structure as a Critical Success Condition for Virtual Communities. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 32337.
  • von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • von Hippel, E. and von Krogh, G. (2003) Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science. Organization Science, 14, 20923.
  • Howe, J. (2008) Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. The Crown Publishing Group, New York.
  • Kohler, T., Matzler, K. and Füller, J. (2009) Avatar-Based Innovation: Using Virtual Worlds for Real-World Innovation. Technovation, 29, 395407.
  • Kozinets, R.V., Hemetsberger, A. and Schau, H.J. (2008) The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds: Collective Innovation in the Age of Networked Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 33954.
  • Kratzer, J. and Lettl, C. (2008) A Social Network Perspective of Lead Users and Creativity: An Empirical Study among Children. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 2636.
  • Kratzer, J. and Lettl, C. (2009) Distinctive Roles of Lead Users and Opinion Leaders in the Social Networks of Schoolchildren. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 64659.
  • von Krogh, G. and von Hippel, E. (2006) The Promise of Research on Open Source Software. Management Science, 52, 97583.
  • Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G. and Hanlon, S.C. (1997) Competition, Cooperation, and the Search for Economic Rents: A Syncretic Model. Academy of Management Review, 22, 11041.
  • Lakhani, K.R. and Wolf, R.G. (2005) Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. In Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S.A. and Lakhani, K.R. (eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 322.
  • Lettl, C., Herstatt, C. and Gemuenden, H.G. (2006) Learning from Users for Radical Innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 33, 2545.
  • Lewins, A. and Silver, C. (2006) Choosing a Caqdas Package: a working paper [WWW document]. URL http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/PDF/ChoosingLewins&SilverV5July06.pdf[accessed on 30 December 2010].
  • Luo, Y. (2007) A Coopetition Perspecitve of Global Competition. Journal of World Business, 42, 12944.
  • McLure Wasko, M. and Faraj, S. (2000) ‘It Is What One Does’: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 15573.
  • McLure Wasko, M. and Faraj, S. (2005) Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 3557.
  • Martinelli, W., Dussauge, P. and Garrette, B. (2002) Food Retailers and Financial Services in the UK: A Co-Opetitive Perspective. British Food Journal, 105, 57790.
  • Maxwell, J.A. (2008) Designing a Qualitative Study. In Bickman, L. and Rog, D.J. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 21453.
  • Morgan, J. and Wang, R. (2010) Tournaments for Ideas. California Management Review, 52, 7797.
  • Nadel, S.F. (1957) The Theory of Social Structure. Cohen & West, London.
  • Nolker, R. and Zhou, L. (2005) Social Computing and Weighting to Identify Member Roles in Online Communities. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. Compiegne University of Technology, France, 19–22 September, pp. 8793.
  • Nov, O. (2007) What Motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50, 6064.
  • Oreg, S. and Nov, O. (2008) Exploring Motivations for Contributing to Open Source Initiatives: The Roles of Contribution Context and Personal Values. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24, 205573.
  • OSRAM (2009) LED – Emotionalize Your Light [WWW document]. URL http://www.led-emotionalize.com[accessed on 3 July 2009].
  • Panzarasa, P., Opsahl, T. and Carley, K.M. (2009) Patterns and Dynamics of Users' Behavior and Interaction: Network Analysis of an Online Community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60, 91132.
  • Preece, J. (2000) Online Communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  • Preece, J., Nonnecke, B. and Andrews, D. (2004) The Top 5 Reasons for Lurking: Improving Community Experiences for Everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 20123.
  • Ritala, P. and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009) What's in It for Me? Creating and Appropriating Value in Innovation-Related Coopetition. Technovation, 29, 81928.
  • Schröder, A. and Hölzle, K. (2010) Virtual Communities for Innovation: Influence Factors and Impact on Company Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 25768.
  • Schroer, J. and Hertel, G. (2009) Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-Based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians, and Why They Do It. Media Psychology, 12, 96120.
  • Sharatt, M. and Usoro, A. (2003) Understanding Knowledge-Sharing in Online Communities ofPractice. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 18796.
  • Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Rodrigues, E.M., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T., Perer, A. and Gleave, E. (2009) Analyzing (Social Media) Networks with Nodexl. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Springer, Berlin.
  • Sobel, D. (1996) Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time. Penguin Group, New York.
  • Thomke, S. and von Hippel, E. (2002) Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review, 80, 7481.
  • Tsai, W. (2002) Social Structure of ‘Coopetition’ within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing. Organization Science, 13, 17990.
  • Walley, K. (2007) Coopetition – an Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37, 1131.
  • Winsor, J. (2005) Spark: Be More Innovative through Co-Creation. Kaplan Business, Chicago, IL.
  • Zemljic, B. and Hlebec, V. (2005) Reliability of Measures of Centrality and Prominence. Social Networks, 27, 7388.
  • Zineldin, M. (2004) Co-Opetiton: The Organisation of the Future. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22, 78089.
  • Zubrin, R. (1996) Mars on a Shoestring. Technology Review, November, 2031.