Mounce and Winch on Understanding (or Not Understanding) an Indigenous Society
Article first published online: 19 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2012.01473.x
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

Philosophical Investigations
Special Issue: British Wittgenstein Society Conference 2011
Volume 35, Issue 3-4, pages 350–372, July/October 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Burley, M. (2012), Mounce and Winch on Understanding (or Not Understanding) an Indigenous Society. Philosophical Investigations, 35: 350–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2012.01473.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 19 APR 2012
Abstract
Howard Mounce and Peter Winch both made novel and illuminating contributions to discussions about how, or whether, we can understand societies very different from our own – societies that would, these days, be referred to as “indigenous,”“tribal,”“traditional” or “small-scale.” This paper aims to elucidate some disagreements between Mounce and Winch while also critically engaging in the debate. The concepts of “practice” and “language-game” are considered in connection with magic-related activities among the Azande of north-central Africa, and Mounce's contention that the Azande's whole way of speaking about magic and witchcraft is “hardly intelligible” is examined. I challenge Mounce's interpretations of certain analogies that he uses, and propose that his argument relies on what is probably an underestimation of the degree to which magic and witchcraft are integral to Azande culture as a whole.

1467-9205/asset/PHIN_left.gif?v=1&s=ddd572d5051c29cfd1787f2758dc50bb5d67e5e2)