PERCEPTUAL CONTENT AND SENSORIMOTOR EXPECTATIONS
Article first published online: 17 DEC 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.691.x
© 2010 The Author The Philosophical Quarterly© 2010 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cavedon-Taylor, D. (2011), PERCEPTUAL CONTENT AND SENSORIMOTOR EXPECTATIONS. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61: 383–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.691.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 17 DEC 2010
Abstract
I distinguish between two kinds of sensorimotor expectations: agent- and object-active ones. Alva Noë's answer to the problem of how perception acquires volumetric content illicitly privileges agent-active expectations over object-active expectations, though the two are explanatorily on a par. Considerations which Noë draws upon concerning how organisms may ‘off-load’ internal processes onto the environment do not support his view that volumetric content depends on our embodiment; rather, they support a view of experience which is restrictive of the body's role in perception. My objections undercut central arguments which Noë gives for his brand of enactivism.

1467-9213/asset/phiq_left.gif?v=1&s=3e274098c3602f7d5c300f7ed97c5b12d7c2071e)
1467-9213/asset/phiq_right.gif?v=1&s=76fc4763c4f37b4ca3c89c416a602d845233e5ec)
