SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Klaus Mittenzwei, Stefan Mann, Karen Refsgaard, Valborg Kvakkestad, Hot cognition in agricultural policy preferences in Norway?, Agriculture and Human Values, 2015,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Kim Fridkin, Patrick J. Kenney, Amanda Wintersieck, Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising, Political Communication, 2015, 32, 1, 127

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Patrizia Milesi, Moral foundations and political attitudes: The moderating role of political sophistication, International Journal of Psychology, 2015, 50, 2
  4. 4
    Stephanie Geise, Christian Baden, Putting the Image Back Into the Frame: Modeling the Linkage Between Visual Communication and Frame-Processing Theory, Communication Theory, 2015, 25, 1
  5. You have free access to this content5
    Paul Thibodeau, Matthew M. Peebles, Daniel J. Grodner, Frank H. Durgin, The Wished-For Always Wins Until the Winner Was Inevitable All Along: Motivated Reasoning and Belief Bias Regulate Emotion during Elections, Political Psychology, 2015, 36, 1
  6. 6
    Bertram Gawronski, Silvia Galdi, Luciano Arcuri, What Can Political Psychology Learn from Implicit Measures? Empirical Evidence and New Directions, Political Psychology, 2015, 36, 1
  7. 7
    Cengiz Erisen, Milton Lodge, Charles S. Taber, Affective Contagion in Effortful Political Thinking, Political Psychology, 2014, 35, 2
  8. 8
    April A. Johnson, Ambivalence, Political Engagement and Context, Political Studies, 2014, 62, 3
  9. 9
    Fabian Endres, Die Deutschen und der Euro, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2014, 8, S2, 101

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    John R. Hibbing, Kevin B. Smith, John R. Alford, Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014, 37, 03, 297

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Cengiz Erisen, José D. Villalobos, Exploring the invocation of emotion in presidential speeches, Contemporary Politics, 2014, 20, 4, 469

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    James L. Gibson, Milton Lodge, Benjamin Woodson, Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority, Law & Society Review, 2014, 48, 4
  13. 13
    Michael D. Jones, Geoboo Song, Making Sense of Climate Change: How Story Frames Shape Cognition, Political Psychology, 2014, 35, 4
  14. 14
    Philipp Runge, Nationale und europäische Identitäten und politische Unterstützung der Europäischen Union im Kontext der Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2014, 8, S2, 55

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Jonathon P. Schuldt, Sungjong Roh, Of Accessibility and Applicability: How Heat-Related Cues Affect Belief in “Global Warming” Versus “Climate Change”, Social Cognition, 2014, 32, 3, 217

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Thomas J. Leeper, Rune Slothuus, Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation, Political Psychology, 2014, 35,
  17. 17
    Jayson Harsin, Public argument in the new media ecology: Implications of temporality, spatiality, and cognition, Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2014, 3, 1, 7

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Adam Lockyer, Peter K. Hatemi, Resolving the Difference between Evolutionary Antecedents of Political Attitudes and Sources of Human Variation, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 2014, 47, 03, 549

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Benjamin J. Newman, Todd K. Hartman, Charles S. Taber, Social Dominance and the Cultural Politics of Immigration, Political Psychology, 2014, 35, 2
  20. 20
    Cecilia Hyunjung Mo, The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters, Political Behavior, 2014,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Douglas R. Oxley, Arnold Vedlitz, B. Dan Wood, The Effect of Persuasive Messages on Policy Problem Recognition, Policy Studies Journal, 2014, 42, 2
  22. 22
    Ingrid Johnsen Haas, William A. Cunningham, The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance, Political Psychology, 2014, 35, 2
  23. 23
    Douglas R. Pierce, Uninformed Votes? Reappraising Information Effects and Presidential Preferences, Political Behavior, 2014,

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz, James Hedrick, An Introduction to Implicit Attitudes in Political Science Research, PS: Political Science & Politics, 2013, 46, 03, 525

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    E. Suhay, T. E. Jayaratne, Does Biology Justify Ideology? The Politics of Genetic Attribution, Public Opinion Quarterly, 2013, 77, 2, 497

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Cengiz Erişen, Emotions as a Determinant in Turkish Political Behavior, Turkish Studies, 2013, 14, 1, 115

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Efrén O. Pérez, Implicit attitudes: meaning, measurement, and synergy with political science, Politics, Groups and Identities, 2013, 1, 2, 275

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Ainius Lašas, Legacies of Srebrenica: The Dutch Factor in EU-Serbian Relations, Political Psychology, 2013, 34, 6
  29. 29
    Lawrence R. Jacobs, Lord Bryce's Curse: The Costs of Presidential Heroism and the Hope of Deliberative Incrementalism, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2013, 43, 4
  30. 30
    Costas Panagopoulos, Positive Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization, Political Psychology, 2013, 34, 2
  31. 31
    Maria Hynes, Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance, The British Journal of Sociology, 2013, 64, 4
  32. 32
    John R. Hibbing, Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics, Perspectives on Politics, 2013, 11, 02, 475

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Kevin Arceneaux, Ryan J. Vander Wielen, The Effects of Need for Cognition and Need for Affect on Partisan Evaluations, Political Psychology, 2013, 34, 1
  34. 34
    Randolph T. Stevenson, Raymond Duch, The meaning and use of subjective perceptions in studies of economic voting, Electoral Studies, 2013, 32, 2, 305

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Michael W. Gruszczynski, Amanda Balzer, Carly M. Jacobs, Kevin B. Smith, John R. Hibbing, The Physiology of Political Participation, Political Behavior, 2013, 35, 1, 135

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Geoffrey D. Munro, Julia Zirpoli, Adam Schuman, Jeff Taulbee, Third-Party Labels Bias Evaluations of Political Platforms and Candidates, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2013, 35, 2, 151

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Matthew S. Levendusky, Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers?, American Journal of Political Science, 2013, 57, 3
  38. 38
    Peter K. Hatemi, Rose McDermott, Broadening Political Psychology, Political Psychology, 2012, 33, 1
  39. 39
    Zeljka Buturovic, DEEP DOWN: CONSEQUENTIALIST ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING POLICY DIFFERENCES, Critical Review, 2012, 24, 2, 269

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Joel Turner, Memorable encounters: Ideology, information acquisition, and television news, The Social Science Journal, 2012, 49, 1, 9

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Charles S. Taber, Milton Lodge, MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM IN THE EVALUATION OF POLITICAL BELIEFS (2006), Critical Review, 2012, 24, 2, 157

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas, Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment, The Journal of Politics, 2012, 74, 03, 672

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Quan Li, Matthew Fuhrmann, Bryan R. Early, Arnold Vedlitz, Preferences, Knowledge, and Citizen Probability Assessments of the Terrorism Risk of Nuclear Power, Review of Policy Research, 2012, 29, 2
  44. 44
    Elif Erisen, Cengiz Erisen, The Effect of Social Networks on the Quality of Political Thinking, Political Psychology, 2012, 33, 6
  45. 45
    Cindy D. Kam, THE PSYCHOLOGICAL VERACITY OF ZALLER'S MODEL, Critical Review, 2012, 24, 4, 545

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Kristina M. Slagle, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Robyn S. Wilson, The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2012, 17, 1, 44

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Michael Bang Petersen, Daniel Sznycer, Leda Cosmides, John Tooby, Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare, Political Psychology, 2012, 33, 3
  48. 48
    KEVIN M. ESTERLING, “Deliberative Disagreement” in U.S. Health Policy Committee Hearings, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2011, 36, 2
  49. 49
    R. Kuhne, C. Schemer, J. Matthes, W. Wirth, Affective Priming in Political Campaigns: How Campaign-Induced Emotions Prime Political Opinions, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2011, 23, 4, 485

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Patrick Fournier, Mathieu Turgeon, André Blais, Joanna Everitt, Elisabeth Gidengil, Neil Nevitte, Deliberation from Within: Changing One's Mind During an Interview, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 5
  51. 51
    Jonathan McDonald Ladd, Gabriel S. Lenz, Does Anxiety Improve Voters' Decision Making?, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 2
  52. 52
    Travis N. Ridout, Kathleen Searles, It's My Campaign I'll Cry if I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 3
  53. 53
    Kevin J. Mullinix, Lingering Debates and Innovative Advances: The State of Public Opinion Research, Policy Studies Journal, 2011, 39,
  54. 54
    Kevin B. Smith, Douglas R. Oxley, Matthew V. Hibbing, John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 3
  55. 55
    L. Nir, Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception, Public Opinion Quarterly, 2011, 75, 3, 504

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, Policy Narratives and Policy Processes, Policy Studies Journal, 2011, 39, 3
  57. 57
    Bethany L. Albertson, Religious Appeals and Implicit Attitudes, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 1
  58. 58
    Thomas J. Rudolph, The Dynamics of Ambivalence, American Journal of Political Science, 2011, 55, 3
  59. 59
    Ted Brader, The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited, Political Psychology, 2011, 32, 2
  60. 60
    Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?, Policy Studies Journal, 2010, 38, 2
  61. 61
    Michael Bang Petersen, Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality, The Journal of Politics, 2010, 72, 02, 357

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Thorsten Faas, Sascha Huber, Experimente in der Politikwissenschaft: Vom Mauerblümchen zum Mainstream, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2010, 51, 4, 721

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Luciana Carraro, Bertram Gawronski, Luigi Castelli, Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates, British Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 49, 3
  64. 64
    Geoffrey D. Munro, Carrie Weih, Jeffrey Tsai, Motivated Suspicion: Asymmetrical Attributions of the Behavior of Political Ingroup and Outgroup Members, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 32, 2, 173

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Peter K. Hatemi, John R. Hibbing, Sarah E. Medland, Matthew C. Keller, John R. Alford, Kevin B. Smith, Nicholas G. Martin, Lindon J. Eaves, Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs, American Journal of Political Science, 2010, 54, 3
  66. 66
    Geoffrey D. Munro, Terell P. Lasane, Scott P. Leary, Political Partisan Prejudice: Selective Distortion and Weighting of Evaluative Categories in College Admissions Applications, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 40, 9
  67. 67
    John Levi Martin, Matthew Desmond, Political Position and Social Knowledge, Sociological Forum, 2010, 25, 1
  68. 68
    Bryan M. Parsons, Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement, Political Behavior, 2010, 32, 2, 181

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    David P. Redlawsk, Andrew J. W. Civettini, Karen M. Emmerson, The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?, Political Psychology, 2010, 31, 4
  70. 70
    Luciana Carraro, Luigi Castelli, The Implicit and Explicit Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: Is the Source Really Blamed?, Political Psychology, 2010, 31, 4
  71. 71
    Charles S. Taber, Damon Cann, Simona Kucsova, The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments, Political Behavior, 2009, 31, 2, 137

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Andrew J. W. Civettini, David P. Redlawsk, Voters, Emotions, and Memory, Political Psychology, 2009, 30, 1
  73. 73
    John R. Alford, Carolyn L. Funk, John R. Hibbing, Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes, Perspectives on Politics, 2008, 6, 02

    CrossRef

  74. 74
    Robert Y. Shapiro, Yaeli Bloch-Elkon, DO THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES? PARTISAN DISAGREEMENT AS A CHALLENGE TO DEMOCRATIC COMPETENCE, Critical Review, 2008, 20, 1-2, 115

    CrossRef

  75. 75
    D. R. Oxley, K. B. Smith, J. R. Alford, M. V. Hibbing, J. L. Miller, M. Scalora, P. K. Hatemi, J. R. Hibbing, Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits, Science, 2008, 321, 5896, 1667

    CrossRef

  76. You have free access to this content76
    Luciano Arcuri, Luigi Castelli, Silvia Galdi, Cristina Zogmaister, Alessandro Amadori, Predicting the Vote: Implicit Attitudes as Predictors of the Future Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters, Political Psychology, 2008, 29, 3
  77. You have free access to this content77
    Joel Weinberger, Drew Westen, RATS, We Should Have Used Clinton: Subliminal Priming in Political Campaigns, Political Psychology, 2008, 29, 5
  78. 78
    John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, The New Empirical Biopolitics, Annual Review of Political Science, 2008, 11, 1, 183

    CrossRef

  79. You have free access to this content79
    Ted Brader, Nicholas A. Valentino, Elizabeth Suhay, What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat, American Journal of Political Science, 2008, 52, 4
  80. 80
    Adam Tyson, Paul Tyson, Dissecting the Attitudes of Political Science Students Towards Democracy and the 2004 Elections in Indonesia, Asian Journal of Political Science, 2007, 15, 3, 259

    CrossRef

  81. 81
    Cindy D. Kam, Implicit Attitudes, Explicit Choices: When Subliminal Priming Predicts Candidate Preference, Political Behavior, 2007, 29, 3, 343

    CrossRef

  82. 82
    Dan Cassino, Charles S. Taber, Milton Lodge, Information processing and public opinion, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2007, 48, 2, 205

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Francis Neely, Party Identification in Emotional and Political Context: A Replication, Political Psychology, 2007, 28, 6
  84. 84
    Matthew J. Lebo, Daniel Cassino, The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval, Political Psychology, 2007, 28, 6
  85. 85
    Jaime Redondo, Isabel Fraga, Isabel Padrón, Montserrat Comesaña, The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words), Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39, 3, 600

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    Harald Schoen, Der demokratische Musterbürger als Normalfall? Kognitionspsychologische Einblicke in die black box politischer Meinungsbildung, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2006, 47, 1, 89

    CrossRef

  87. 87
    Inna Burdein, Milton Lodge, Charles Taber, Experiments on the Automaticity of Political Beliefs and Attitudes, Political Psychology, 2006, 27, 3
  88. 88
    Charles S. Taber, Milton Lodge, Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs, American Journal of Political Science, 2006, 50, 3