SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Achen, C. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review, 69(December), 12181231.
  • Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Basinger, S. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 99(March), 169184.
  • Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, G., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96(March), 5773.
  • Coleman, J. J., & Manna, P. F. (2000). Congressional campaign spending and the quality of democracy. Journal of Politics, 62(August), 757789.
  • Craig, S. C., Kane, J. G., & Martinez, M. (2002). Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't: Citizens' ambivalence about abortion. Political Psychology, 23, 285301.
  • Craig, S. C., Martinez, M., Kane, J. G., & Gainous, J. (2005). Core values, value conflict, and citizens' ambivalence about gay rights. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 517.
  • Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36(February), 268307.
  • Freedman, P., Franz, M., & Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48(October), 723741.
  • Green, M. C., Visser, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 13801391.
  • Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199236.
  • Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945960.
  • Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogenous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 6595.
  • Jacobson, G. C. (2003). The politics of congressional elections. 6th ed. New York: Longman.
  • Jacoby, W. G. (2005). Is it really ambivalence? Public opinion toward government spending. In S. C.Craig & M.Martinez (Eds.), Ambivalence and the structure of political opinion (pp. 149172). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Keele, L., & Wolak, J. (2006). Value conflict and volatility in party identification. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 671690.
  • Krassa, M. A. (1990). Political information, social environments, and deviants. Political Behavior, 12(September), 315330.
  • Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 34(April): 398421.
  • Lavine, H., Thomsen, C. J., Zanna, M. P., & Borgida, E. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398421.
  • Lavine, H., & Steenbergen, M. (2005). Group ambivalence and electoral decision-making. In S. C.Craig & M.Martinez (Eds.), Ambivalence, politics, and public policy (pp. 126). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McGraw, K. M., & Bartels, B. (2005). Ambivalence toward American political institutions: Sources and consequences. In S. C.Craig & M.Martinez (Eds.), Ambivalence and the structure of political opinion (pp. 105126). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McGraw, K. M., Hasecke, E., & Conger, K. (2003). Ambivalence, uncertainty, and processes of candidate evaluation. Political Psychology, 24, 421448.
  • Meffert, M. F., Guge, M., & Lodge, M. (2004). Good, bad, and ambivalent: The consequences of multidimensional political attitudes. In W. E.Saris & P.Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error and change (pp. 6392). Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(October), 838855.
  • Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133164.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 688701.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 3458.
  • Rudolph, T. J. (2005). Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Political Psychology, 26, 905928.
  • Rudolph, T. J., & Popp, E. (2007). An information processing theory of ambivalence. Political Psychology, 28, 563585.
  • Sekhon, J. S. (2007). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software. Forthcoming.
  • Sekhon, J. S., & Diamond, A. (2005). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects. Presented at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology.
  • Shaw, D. R. (2006). The Race to 270: The electoral college and the campaign strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Steenbergen, M. R., & Brewer, P. R. (2004). The not so ambivalent public: Policy attitudes in the political culture of ambivalence. In W. E.Saris & P.Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error and change (pp. 93129). Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
  • Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(January), 218237.
  • Sullivan, J. L. (1973). Political correlates of social, economic and religious diversity in the american states. Journal of Politics, 35, 7084.
  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E.Petty & J. A.Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedants and consequences (pp. 361386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.