SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    PerOla Öberg, Katrin Uba, Civil Society Making Political Claims: Outcries, Interest Advocacy, and Deliberative Claims, Public Administration Review, 2014, 74, 3
  2. 2
    Jennifer Brundidge, Scott A. Reid, Sujin Choi, Ashley Muddiman, The “Deliberative Digital Divide:” Opinion Leadership and Integrative Complexity in the U.S. Political Blogosphere, Political Psychology, 2014, 35, 3
  3. 3
    Lu Xiao, Nicole Askin, What influences online deliberation? A wikipedia study, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 5
  4. 4
    Nicole Curato, Simon Niemeyer, John S. Dryzek, Appreciative and contestatory inquiry in deliberative forums: can group hugs be dangerous?, Critical Policy Studies, 2013, 7, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Hélène Landemore, Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives, Synthese, 2013, 190, 7, 1209

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Hélène Landemore, On Minimal Deliberation, Partisan Activism, and Teaching People How to Disagree, Critical Review, 2013, 25, 2, 210

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Hugo Mercier, The function of reasoning: Argumentative and pragmatic alternatives, Thinking & Reasoning, 2013, 19, 3-4, 488

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Hugo Mercier, Christophe Heintz, The place of evolved cognition in scientific thinking, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2013, 3, 2, 128

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Howard Darmstadter, Why do humans reason? A pragmatist supplement to an argumentative theory, Thinking & Reasoning, 2013, 19, 3-4, 472

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    H. Mercier, D. Sperber, "Two Heads Are Better" Stands to Reason, Science, 2012, 336, 6084, 979

    CrossRef