SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693716.
  • Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518529.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256274.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431441.
  • Antoniakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Prediction election outcomes: Child's play! Science, 323(5918), 1183.
  • Atkinson, M., Enos, R. D., & Hill, S. J. (2009). Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face-vote correlation caused by candidate selection? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 229249.
  • Bailenson, J. N., Garland, P., Iyengar, S., & Yee, N. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology, 27, 373385.
  • Ballew, C. C., & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 1794817953.
  • Bartels, L. M. (2008). The irrational electorate. The Wilson Quarterly, 32(4), 4450.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433436.
  • Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 802811.
  • Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189201.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103, 356363.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2008). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837852.
  • Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 125.
  • Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271296.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2008). An exploration of correct voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 395411.
  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951971.
  • Lawson, C., Lenz, G., Baker, A., & Myers, M. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62(4).
  • Lenz, G., & Lawson, C. (2007, August–September). Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates' appearance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Mattes, K., Spezio, M., Kim, H., Todorov, A., Adolphs, R., & Alvarez, R. M. (2010). Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images. Political Psychology, 31, 4158.
  • Mesko, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature, 15, 251270.
  • Miller, R. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mintz, A. (2004a). Foreign policy decision making in familiar and unfamiliar settings: An experimental study of high-ranking military officers. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48, 91104.
  • Mintz, A. (2004b). How do leaders make decisions? A poliheuristic perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48, 313.
  • Muscarella, F., & Cunningham, M. R. (1996). The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology & Sociobiology, 17(2), 99117.
  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437442.
  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884887.
  • Reed, S. K. (2007). Cognition: Theory and applications. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199226.
  • Rosenberg, S. W. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108127.
  • Rosenberg, S. W., Kahn, S., Tran, T., & Le, M.-T. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13, 345367.
  • Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19(2), 109111.
    Direct Link:
  • Said, C. P., Sebe, N., & Todorov, A. (2009). Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion, 9, 260264.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2003). Introduction: Cognitive components of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 563571). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spezio, M., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional processing and political judgment: Toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 7195). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Spezio, M. L., Rangel, A., Alvarez, R. M., O'Doherty, J. P., Mattes, K., Todorov, A., Kim, J., & Adolphs, R. (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 344352.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
  • Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349354.
  • Terry, R. L., & Krantz, J. H. (1993). Dimensions of trait attributions with eyeglasses, men's facial hair, and women's hair length. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 17571769.
  • Todorov, A., Gobbini, M. I., Evans, K. K., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception. Neuropsychologia, 45, 163173.
  • Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 16231626.
  • Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 455460.
  • Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors' faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549562.
  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592598.
    Direct Link: