• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

Thin-Slice Decisions Do Not Need Faces to be Predictive of Election Outcomes

  1. Michael L. Spezio1,
  2. Laura Loesch2,
  3. Frédéric Gosselin3,
  4. Kyle Mattes4,
  5. R. Michael Alvarez2

Article first published online: 26 APR 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00897.x

Issue

Political Psychology

Political Psychology

Special Issue: THE POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY OF BIOLOGY, GENETICS AND BEHAVIOR

Volume 33, Issue 3, pages 331–341, June 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Spezio, M. L., Loesch, L., Gosselin, F., Mattes, K. and Alvarez, R. M. (2012), Thin-Slice Decisions Do Not Need Faces to be Predictive of Election Outcomes. Political Psychology, 33: 331–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00897.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Scripps College and California Institute of Technology

  2. 2

    California Institute of Technology

  3. 3

    Université de Montréal

  4. 4

    University of Iowa

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 28 MAY 2012
  2. Article first published online: 26 APR 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (188K)

REFERENCES

  • Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716.
  • Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.
  • Antoniakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Prediction election outcomes: Child's play! Science, 323(5918), 1183.
  • Atkinson, M., Enos, R. D., & Hill, S. J. (2009). Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face-vote correlation caused by candidate selection? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 229–249.
  • Bailenson, J. N., Garland, P., Iyengar, S., & Yee, N. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology, 27, 373–385.
    Direct Link:
  • Ballew, C. C., & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 17948–17953.
  • Bartels, L. M. (2008). The irrational electorate. The Wilson Quarterly, 32(4), 44–50.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
  • Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 802–811.
  • Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189–201.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103, 356–363.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2008). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–852.
  • Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.
  • Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2008). An exploration of correct voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 395–411.
    Direct Link:
  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971.
  • Lawson, C., Lenz, G., Baker, A., & Myers, M. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62(4).
  • Lenz, G., & Lawson, C. (2007, August–September). Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates' appearance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Mattes, K., Spezio, M., Kim, H., Todorov, A., Adolphs, R., & Alvarez, R. M. (2010). Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images. Political Psychology, 31, 41–58.
    Direct Link:
  • Mesko, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature, 15, 251–270.
  • Miller, R. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mintz, A. (2004a). Foreign policy decision making in familiar and unfamiliar settings: An experimental study of high-ranking military officers. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48, 91–104.
  • Mintz, A. (2004b). How do leaders make decisions? A poliheuristic perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48, 3–13.
  • Muscarella, F., & Cunningham, M. R. (1996). The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology & Sociobiology, 17(2), 99–117.
  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.
  • Reed, S. K. (2007). Cognition: Theory and applications. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.
  • Rosenberg, S. W. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108–127.
  • Rosenberg, S. W., Kahn, S., Tran, T., & Le, M.-T. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13, 345–367.
  • Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19(2), 109–111.
    Direct Link:
  • Said, C. P., Sebe, N., & Todorov, A. (2009). Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion, 9, 260–264.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2003). Introduction: Cognitive components of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 563–571). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spezio, M., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional processing and political judgment: Toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 71–95). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Spezio, M. L., Rangel, A., Alvarez, R. M., O'Doherty, J. P., Mattes, K., Todorov, A., Kim, J., & Adolphs, R. (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 344–352.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
  • Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354.
  • Terry, R. L., & Krantz, J. H. (1993). Dimensions of trait attributions with eyeglasses, men's facial hair, and women's hair length. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1757–1769.
    Direct Link:
  • Todorov, A., Gobbini, M. I., Evans, K. K., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception. Neuropsychologia, 45, 163–173.
  • Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.
  • Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 455–460.
  • Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors' faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549–562.
  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (188K)