SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baldwin, N. (1985) ‘Behavioural Changes: A New Professionalism and a More Independent House’, in P.Norton (ed.), Parliament in the 1980s. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 96113.
  • Baldwin, N. (1995) ‘The House of Lords and the Labour Government 1974–79’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 1 (2), 21842.
  • Barker, R. (1990) Political Legitimacy and the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Beetham, D. (1991) The Legitimation of Power. New York: Palgrave.
  • Benn, T. (1988a) Out of the Wilderness: Diaries 1963–66. London: Arrow Books.
  • Benn, T. (1988b) Office without Power: Diaries 1968–72. London: Hutchinson.
  • Benn, T. (1990) Against the Tide: Diaries 1973–77. London: Arrow Books.
  • Callaghan, J. (1987) Time and Chance. London: Methuen.
  • Castle, B. (1980) The Castle Diaries. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Cowley, P. (2002) Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under Blair. London: Politico's.
  • Cowley, P. (2005) The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority. London: Politico's.
  • Crossman, R. (1979) The Crossman Diaries. London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.
  • Flinders, M. (2005) ‘Majoritarian Democracy in Britain’, West European Politics, 28 (1), 6294.
  • Healey, D. (2006) The Time of My Life. Hampshire: Politico's.
  • Hitchens, P. (1998) ‘Is This the Road to the British Reich?’, Daily Express, 19 October, p. 13.
  • House of Lords (1998) Proposals for Reform of the Composition and Powers of the House of Lords, 1968–98. House of Lords Library note LLN 98/004. London: House of Lords.
  • House of Lords (2008) The Work of the House of Lords 2006–07. London: House of Lords.
  • Jenkins, R. (2006) Life at the Centre. Hampshire: Politico's.
  • Jennings, I. (1957) Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joint Committee on Conventions (2006) Conventions of the UK Parliament. Report of Session 2005–06, HL Paper 265. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Judge, D. (1993) The Parliamentary State. London: Sage.
  • King, A. (1976) ‘Modes of Executive–Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1 (1), 1134.
  • Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • Mezey, M. (1990) ‘Classifying Legislatures’, in P.Norton (ed.) Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, pp. 14976.
  • Miers, D. and Brock, J. (1993) ‘Government Legislation: Case Studies’, in D.Shell and D.Beamish (eds), The House of Lords at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97136.
  • Morgan, J. P. (1975) The House of Lords and the Labour Government 1964–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Russell, M. (2000) Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from Overseas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Russell, M. and Johns, J. (2007) ‘Bicameral Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills: A Case Study of the Identity Cards Bill’. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Bath, 11–3 April.
  • Russell, M. and Sciara, M. (2007) ‘Why Does the Government Get Defeated in the House of Lords? The Lords, the Party System and British Politics’, British Politics, 2 (3), 299322.
  • Russell, M. and Sciara, M. (2008) ‘The Policy Impact of Defeats in the House of Lords’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10 (4), 57189.
  • Sartori, G. (1994) Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Saward, M. (1991) Co-optive Politics and State Legitimacy. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  • Shell, D. (1992a) The House of Lords. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Shell, D. (1992b) ‘The House of Lords: The Best Second Chamber We Have Got?’, in B.Jones and L.Robins (eds), Two Decades in British Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15572.
  • Shell, D. (1993) ‘Conclusion’, in D.Shell and D.Beamish (eds), The House of Lords at Work. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 32551.
  • Shell, D. (1999) ‘To Revise and Deliberate: The British House of Lords’, in S. C.Patterson and A.Mughan (eds), Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press, pp. 199224.
  • Shell, D. (2000) ‘Labour and the House of Lords: A Case Study in Constitutional Reform’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53 (2), 290310.
  • Shell, D. (2007) The House of Lords. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Shell, D. and Beamish, D. (eds) (1993) The House of Lords at Work. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Strathclyde, T. (1999) ‘Redefining the Boundaries between the Two Houses’, Speech to think tank Politeia, 30 December.
  • Thomas, G. (1985) Mr Speaker: The Memoirs of Viscount Tonypandy. Sussex: Guild Publishing.
  • Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tsebelis, G. and Money, J. (1997) Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.
  • Young, H. (1999) ‘He Calls it Reform, but All Blair Wants is an Impotent Second Chamber’, The Guardian, 9 February, p. 16.