SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arter, D. (2004) The Scottish Parliament: A Scandinavian-Style Assembly? London: Frank Cass.
  • Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Tolbert, C. (eds) (1998) Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
  • Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J. (2007) ‘Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies’, Political Research Quarterly, 60 (3), 35162.
  • Bromley, C., Curtice, J. and Seyd, B. (2004) ‘Is Britain facing a crisis of democracy?’, London: CREST/ESRC briefing [online]. Available from: http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p106.pdf[Accessed 4 March 2010.
  • Bromley, C. and Given, L. (2005) Public Perceptions of Scotland after Devolution. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.
  • Cain, B. E., Dalton, R. J. and Scarrow, S. E. (eds) (2003) Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cobb, R. and Elder, C. (1972) Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Curtice, J. (2005) ‘Restoring Confidence and Legitimacy? Devolution and Public Opinion’, in A. Trench (ed.), Has Devolution Made a Difference? London: Constitution Unit, pp. 21735.
  • Curtice, J. and Jowell, R. (1995) ‘The Sceptical Electorate’, in R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook, D. Ahrendt and K. Thomson (eds), British Social Attitudes, the 12th Report. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 14171.
  • Curtice, J. and Jowell, R. (1997) ‘Trust in the Political System’, in R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook, K. Thomson and C. Bryson (eds), British Social Attitudes, the 14th Report. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 89109.
  • Dalton, R. J. (1999) ‘Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5776.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dalton, R. J., Burklin, W. and Drummond, A. (2001) ‘Public Opinion and Direct Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 12 (4), 14153.
  • Dalton, R. J., Scarrow, S. E. and Cain, B. E. (2003) ‘New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions’, in B. E. Cain, R. J. Dalton and S. E. Scarrow (eds), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 122.
  • Dewar, D. (1998) ‘The Scottish Parliament’, Scottish Affairs: Special Issue on Understanding Constitutional Change, 412.
  • Gerber, E., Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. and Kiewiet, D. R. (2001) Stealing the Initiative. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Greene, W. H. (1990) Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
  • Grimes, M. (2006) ‘Organizing Consent: The Role of Procedural Fairness in Political Trust and Compliance’, European Journal of Political Research, 45 (2), 285315.
  • Hansard Society (2008) The Audit of Political Engagement 5, the 2008 Report. London: Hansard Society.
  • Hibbing, J. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2001) ‘Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be’, American Political Science Review, 95 (1), 14553.
  • Hill, L. B. (1974) ‘Parliamentary Petition, the Ombudsman and Political Change in New Zealand’, Political Studies, 22 (3), 33746.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Judge, D. (1978) ‘Public Petitions and the House of Commons’, Parliamentary Affairs, 31 (4), 391405.
  • LeDuc, L. (2003) The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in a Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.
  • Lupia, A. and Matsusaka, J. G. (2004) ‘Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions’, Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 46382.
  • McGarvey, N. and Cairney, P. (2008) Scottish Politics: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Mangione, T. W. (1995) Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
  • Matsusaka, J. (2004) For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy and American Democracy. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Newton, K. (2006) ‘Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society and Political and Economic Performance’, Political Studies, 54 (4), 84664.
  • Norris, P. (1999a) ‘Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens?’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 130.
  • Norris, P. (1999b) ‘Institutional Explanations for Political Support’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21734.
  • Norris, P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ormston, R. (2008) Scottish Social Attitudes Survey 2007 Core Module Report 1: Attitudes to Government in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
  • Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2003a) ‘Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain’, Political Studies, 51 (4), 61633.
  • Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2003b) ‘Civic Attitudes and Engagement in Modern Britain’, Parliamentary Affairs, 56 (4), 61633.
  • Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2004) Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Putnam, R. (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Scottish Office (1999) Shaping Scotland's Parliament: Report of the Consultative Steering Group. Edinburgh: Stationery Office.
  • Tyler, T. (1994) ‘Governing amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government’, Law and Society Review, 28 (4), 80931.
  • Tyler, T. (1997) ‘The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (4), 32345.
  • Tyler, T. (2000) ‘Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure’, International Journal of Psychology, 35 (2), 11725.
  • Verba, S. (2006) ‘Fairness, Equality and Democracy: Three Big Words’, Social Research, 73 (2), 499540.
  • Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (2002) High Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Winetrobe, B. (2001) Realising the Vision: A Parliament with a Purpose. London: The Constitution Unit.