Two Arguments for Child Enfranchisement
Article first published online: 22 FEB 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00940.x
© 2012 The Author. Political Studies © 2012 Political Studies Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Lau, J. C. (2012), Two Arguments for Child Enfranchisement. Political Studies, 60: 860–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00940.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 22 FEB 2012
- (Accepted: 19 June 2011)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- enfranchisement;
- children;
- voting age;
- political capacity;
- symmetry
The right to vote is fundamental to democratic citizenship; it is one of the most important badges of political and legal equality. However, we deny it to children, generally without discussion. After exploring conceptions of ‘political capacity’, I launch two arguments. The first is the Symmetry Argument: whatever level of capacity we use for the disenfranchisement of children should be used in symmetrical fashion to disenfranchise the elderly. The second is the Argument from Domains: if we attribute responsibility to children in the legal domain, we should also attribute it to them in the political domain. If we do not actually disenfranchise the elderly, we must find a good reason why we displace that symmetry. I discuss such objections and show why they can be refuted or disregarded.

1467-9248/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=0e3fe6e2d40e064e039420265247d194b32d5821)
1467-9248/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=07fe638ad1ad6cee5f38563ae0b0f01f357eea18)
1467-9248/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=896955fcc2a72eb64a3f1d198cf3aa73aa6331ed)
