Meeting of the Aristotelian Society held at Senate House, University of London, on 7 February 2011 at 4:15 p.m.
VIII—BeyondEros: Friendship in thePhaedrus
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00308.x
© 2011 The Aristotelian Society
Issue

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback)
Volume 111, Issue 2pt2, pages 251–273, April 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sheffield, F. C. C. (2011), VIII—BeyondEros: Friendship in thePhaedrus. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 111: 251–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00308.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
It is often held that Plato did not have a viable account of interpersonal love. The account of eros—roughly, desire—in the Symposium appears to fail, and, though the Lysis contains much suggestive material for an account of philia—roughly, friendship—this is an aporetic dialogue, which fails, ultimately, to provide an account of friendship. This paper argues that Plato's account of friendship is in the Phaedrus. This dialogue outlines three kinds of philia relationship, the highest of which compares favourably to the Aristotelian notion of love for another ‘for their own sake’. In contrast to the account of eros in the Symposium, this gives Plato an account of interpersonal love that meets some of the requirements laid down by Gregory Vlastos (1973) for a satisfactory account of interpersonal love.

1467-9264/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=00923398ab4ad2b4f27bb751593c12a190c64548)
1467-9264/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=d0488d3b4e15fbeb8dc3ca2fc063552f9baa49b0)