Self-Respect Regained
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00311.x
© 2011 The Aristotelian Society
Issue

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback)
Volume 111, Issue 2pt2, pages 311–318, April 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Chandler, J. and Rieger, A. (2011), Self-Respect Regained. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 111: 311–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00311.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
In a recent article, David Christensen casts aspersions on a restricted version of van Fraassen's Reflection principle, which he dubs ‘Self-Respect’(sr). Rejecting two possible arguments for sr, he concludes that the principle does not constitute a requirement of rationality. In this paper we argue that not only has Christensen failed to make a case against the aforementioned arguments, but that considerations pertaining to Moore's paradox indicate that sr, or at the very least a mild weakening thereof, is indeed a plausible normative principle.

1467-9264/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=00923398ab4ad2b4f27bb751593c12a190c64548)
1467-9264/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=d0488d3b4e15fbeb8dc3ca2fc063552f9baa49b0)