OPEN HOUSE? FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE UK PARLIAMENT
Version of Record online: 9 APR 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 90, Issue 4, pages 901–921, December 2012
How to Cite
HAZELL, R., BOURKE, G. and WORTHY, B. (2012), OPEN HOUSE? FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE UK PARLIAMENT. Public Administration, 90: 901–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02024.x
- Issue online: 20 DEC 2012
- Version of Record online: 9 APR 2012
- Date received 3 May 2010. Date accepted 12 September 2010.
Not all parliaments are subject to Freedom of Information (FOI), and no one has studied what difference it makes to the working of a parliament. This article evaluates the impact of FOI on the UK Parliament by reference to its main objectives. It finds that FOI has made Westminster slightly more open and accountable; but it has not increased public understanding, participation, or trust. Westminster was already very open and other initiatives have helped increase participation. Trust was badly damaged by the MPs' expenses scandal, triggered by FOI requests. The House of Commons' hesitant response to those requests revealed problems of corporate governance.