1467-9329/asset/RATI_centre.gif?v=1&s=15994c512bc789b4238de834e6ed87c4cd73c8e6)
PERMUTATIONS AND FOSTER PROBLEMS: TWO PUZZLES OR ONE?
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00387.x
© 2008 The Author
Additional Information
How to Cite
Williams, J. R. G. (2008), PERMUTATIONS AND FOSTER PROBLEMS: TWO PUZZLES OR ONE?. Ratio, 21: 91–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00387.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2008
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
How are permutation arguments for the inscrutability of reference to be formulated in the context of a Davidsonian truth-theoretic semantics? Davidson (1979) takes these arguments to establish that there are no grounds for favouring a reference scheme that assigns London to ‘Londres’, rather than one that assigns Sydney to that name. We shall see, however, that it is far from clear whether permutation arguments work when set out in the context of the kind of truth-theoretic semantics which Davidson favours. The principle required to make the argument work allows us to resurrect Foster problems against the Davidsonian position. The Foster problems and the permutation inscrutability problems stand or fall together: they are one puzzle, not two.1