ENFRANCHISING INCOMPETENTS: SURETYSHIP AND THE JOINT AUTHORSHIP OF LAWS
Article first published online: 9 MAY 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00490.x
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Goodin, R. E. and Lau, J. C. (2011), ENFRANCHISING INCOMPETENTS: SURETYSHIP AND THE JOINT AUTHORSHIP OF LAWS. Ratio, 24: 154–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00490.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 9 MAY 2011
Abstract
Proposals to lower the age of voting, to 15 for example, are regularly met with worries that people that age are not sufficiently ‘competent’. Notice however that we allow people that age to sign binding legal contracts, provided that those contracts are co-signed by their parents. Notice, further, that in a democracy voters are collectively ‘joint authors’ of the laws that they enact. Enfranchising some less competent voters is no worry, the Condorcet Jury Theorem assures us, so long as the electorate's competence averaging across all voters remains better-than-random.

1467-9329/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=4d9f3efe1e0c1bfe285c7e518506bee867c9d1ac)
