I am grateful to Ricardo Caracciolo and Cristina Redondo for discussing the arguments of this article. I also want to thank the anonymous referee, Jan Sieckmann and Laura Clérico for their criticism and suggestions.
Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective*
Version of Record online: 3 AUG 2012
© 2012 The Author. Ratio Juris © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Volume 25, Issue 3, pages 381–392, September 2012
How to Cite
GAIDO, P. (2012), Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective. Ratio Juris, 25: 381–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00519.x
- Issue online: 3 AUG 2012
- Version of Record online: 3 AUG 2012
This article examines Robert Alexy's account of legal validity. It concludes that Alexy's account of legal validity lacks sufficient support given the author's methodological commitments. To reach that conclusion, it assesses the plausibility of simultaneously maintaining that the participant's perspective has conceptual privilege in the explanation of the nature of law, that legal discourse is a special case of general practical discourse, and that unjust considerations can be legally valid norms.