WAGE DIFFERENTIALS, DISCRIMINATION AND INEQUALITY: A CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE JUHN, MURPHY AND PIERCE DECOMPOSITION METHOD
Article first published online: 22 JAN 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00475.x
© 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 Scottish Economic Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Yun, M.-S. (2009), WAGE DIFFERENTIALS, DISCRIMINATION AND INEQUALITY: A CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE JUHN, MURPHY AND PIERCE DECOMPOSITION METHOD. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56: 114–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00475.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 22 JAN 2009
- Date of receipt of final manuscript: 21 April 2008
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Cited in:
- CrossRef
This article has been cited by:
- 1, , He said, she said: The gender wage gap according to self and proxy reports in the Current Population Survey, Social Science Research, 2012, 41, 2, 392
- 2, The gender gap in earnings: an international comparison with European matched employer–employee data, Applied Economics, 2012, 44, 15, 1985
- 3, , , Why do women still earn less than men? Decomposing the Dutch gender pay gap, 1996–2006, Applied Economics, 2012, 44, 33, 4343
- 4, , Regional wage differentials in Portugal: Static and dynamic approaches, Papers in Regional Science, 2011, 90, 3Direct Link:
- 5, , , An empirical analysis of the gender earnings gap between the public and private sectors in Korea: A comparative study with the US, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2010, 24, 3, 441

1467-9485/asset/SJPE_left.gif?v=1&s=a4095778f7433b8e7e480682e04bdf9651bf9df2)
1467-9485/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=b3ad5004495434ead697df92ae5f988121a582c8)
