Get access

Temperamental, Parental, and Contextual Contributors to Early-emerging Internalizing Problems: A New Integrative Analysis Approach

Authors


  • This research was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant MOP-74642 awarded to the team, and by grants from Health Canada (Child and Youth Division), awarded to Lisa Serbin and colleagues from the Concordia Longitudinal Risk Project, from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec grants awarded to Paul Hastings for the Daycare and Preschool Adjustment Study, and from Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant MOP-57670 to Rosemary Mills for the Shame in Childhood Study. We thank the children and parents who made this research possible and gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Farriola Ladha, Claude Senneville, Nadine Girouard, and Bobbi Walling. We also thank Keith Widaman for statistical consultation.

Rosemary S. L. Mills, Department of Family Social Sciences, University of Manitoba, 35 Chancellor's Circle, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada. Email: rosemary_mills@umanitoba.ca

Abstract

This study evaluated a comprehensive model of factors associated with internalizing problems (IP) in early childhood, hypothesizing direct, mediated, and moderated pathways linking child temperamental inhibition, maternal overcontrol and rejection, and contextual stressors to IP. In a novel approach, three samples were integrated to form a large sample (N = 500) of Canadian children (2–6 years; M = 3.95 years; SD = .80). Items tapping into the same constructs across samples were used to create parallel measures of inhibited temperament, maternal positive, critical, and punitive parenting, maternal negative emotionality, family socioeconomic and structural stressors, and child's IP. Multiple-groups structural equation modeling indicated that associations were invariant across samples and did not differ for boys and girls. Child inhibition, less positive and more critical parenting, maternal negative emotionality, and family socioeconomic disadvantage were found to have direct associations with IP. In addition, maternal negative emotionality was associated with IP through more critical parenting, and both maternal negative emotionality and socioeconomic stress were associated with IP through less positive parenting. Results highlight the multiple independent and cumulative risk factors for early IP and demonstrate the power of integrating data across developmental studies.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary